Testing dialects with simulations : the status of pseudo-partitives in US English

Roč.73,č.1(2025)

Kurt Erbach Remus Gergel

https://doi.org/10.5817/LB2025-38532

Trvalý odkaz (handle):
http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/digilib.82571

PDF (angličtina)
Abstrakt
This paper presents experimental evidence of direct pseudo-partitives being preferred with measure readings rather than container readings. While direct pseudo-partitives (e.g. two cups water) have been called register specific (i.e. cooking contexts), recent evidence has shown that they not only occur more broadly albeit relatively infrequently when compared to indirect pseudo-partitives (e.g. two cups of water), but also that they do not seem to occur with container readings (i.e. two distinct cups, each containing water), as opposed to measure readings (i.e. water to the amount of two cups), or being ambiguous. The results of the present experiment are such that participants rate direct pseudo-partitives with nonce quantity words (e.g. two dakes water) as more natural in sentences with measure readings than when in sentences with container readings. This evidence is taken to support theories of pseudo-partitive syntax in which measure and container readings are derived, not only with different semantics, but different syntax as well, rather than theories which argue for different semantics but relatively uniform syntax across measure and container readings. Moreover, this data suggests that, while direct pseudo-partitives are most commonly found in cooking contexts in US English they are not-necessarily a register-specific form, given the measure reading is demonstrably preferable to the container reading even in non-cooking contexts.

Klíčová slova:
pseudo-partitives; language simulation; syntax-semantics interface

Stránky:
93–111
Reference

Altenhof, Aja – Roberts, Gareth. 2023. Quality, not quantity, impacts the differentiation of near-synonyms. Language and Cognition: 1–23.

Barr, Dale J. – Levy, Roger – Scheepers, Christoph – Tily, Harry J. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3): 255–278.

Bates, Douglas – Mächler, Martin – Bolker, Ben – Walker, Steve. 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1): 1–48.

Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense: In name only, vol. 1. Oxford University Press.

Brysbaert, Marc – Stevens, Michaël. 2018. Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition 1(1): 1–20.

Davies, Mark. 2008. The corpus of contemporary american english (COCA). URL: https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/.

Erbach, Kurt. 2024. Partitives. Chapter for The Grammatical History of the Germanic Languages, submitted to Handbook Series on the Germanic Languages with Mouton De Gruyter, Ms. Saarland University.

Erbach, Kurt – Gergel, Remus. 2025. Direct pseudo-partitives in US English. Linguistics Vanguard. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2023-0098/html

Fischer, Olga – Van Kemenade, Ans – Koopman, Willem – Van der Wurff, Wim. 2000. The Syntax of Early English. Cambridge University Press.

Gergel, Remus. 2020. Sich ausgehen: Actuality entailments and further notes from the perspective of an Austrian German motion verb construction. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 5(2): 5–15.

Gergel, Remus – Kopf-Giammanco, Martin – Puhl, Maike. 2021. Simulating semantic change: A methodological note. Experiments in Linguistic Meaning 1: 184–196.

Gergel, Remus – Puhl, Maike – Dampfhofer, Simon. – Onea, Edgar. 2023. The rise and particularly fall of presuppositions: Evidence from duality in universals. Experiments in Linguistic Meaning 2: 72–82.

Giannakidou, Anastasia – Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2017. The landscape of negative dependencies: Negative concord and n-words. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 1–38.

Gleitman, Lila – Cassidy, Kimberly – Rebecca Nappa – Papafragou, Anna – Trueswell, John. 2005. Hard words. Language Learning and Development 1: 23–64.

Green, Peter – MacLeod, Catriona J. 2016. SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7(4): 493–498.

Green, Peter – MacLeod, Catriona J. – Alday, Phillip. 2016. Package 'simr'. URL: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/simr/simr.pdf.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. X Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. MIT press.

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2001. "a piece of the cake" and "a cup of tea": Partitive and pseudo-partitive nominal in the Circum-Baltic Languages. In: Östen Dahl – Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria (eds.), The Circum-Baltic Languages: Typology and Contact. Vol. 2 Grammar and Typology, 523–568. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Lau, Jay Han – Clark, Alexander – Lappin, Shalom. 2017. Grammaticality, acceptability, and probability: A probabilistic view of linguistic knowledge. Cognitive Science 41(5): 1202–1241.

Rothstein, Susan. 2009. Individuating and measure readings of classifier constructions: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. Brill's Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 1(1): 106–145.

R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing Vienna, Austria. URL: http://www.R-project.org/

Stickney, Helen. 2009. The Emergence of DP in the Partitive Structure. University of Massachusetts dissertations.

Sutton, Peter R. – Filip, Hana. 2021. Container, portion, and measure interpretations of pseudo-partitive constructions. In: Kiss, Tibor – Pelletier, Francis Jeffry – Husić, Halima (eds.), Things and Stuff: The Semantics of the Count-Mass Distinction, 279–304. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1998. Categorial feature magnetism: The endocentricity and distribution of projections. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2(1): 1–48.

Vos, Hinderika Margaretha. 1999. A Grammar of Partitive Constructions. TILDIL Dissertation Series.

Wood, Johanna L. 2020. From noun to quantifier. In: Historical Linguistics 2017: Selected Papers from the 23rd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 350, 229–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Metriky

1

Crossref logo

103

Views

0

PDF (angličtina) views

Creative Commons License

Tato práce je licencována pod Mezinárodní licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0.

PDF (angličtina)