A suppletion-pattern gap in 'tripartite' tense-aspect systems

Roč.73,č.1(2025)

Abstrakt
The present paper identifies a new gap in tense-aspect suppletion patterns in Indo-European 'tripartite' tense-aspect systems: For any triple of present-imperfect-aorist forms, the present and aorist forms never share the same base to the exclusion of the imperfect form. I explore the analysability of the relevant gap as a 'containment-and-competition' gap, i.e. in terms of Bobaljik's (2012) *ABA, or, alternatively, as a 'structure-and-locality' gap, i.e. in terms of Bobaljik's *AAB. I argue that, though the present-imperfect-aorist triple does not plausibly meet the morphosyntactic eligibility criteria for the former type of analysis, it does for the latter, once we allow for a specific kind of structural variation across tripartite tense-aspect systems. These conclusions suggest that there are domains in which 'structure-and-locality' gaps arise in the absence of 'containment-and-competition' gaps.

Klíčová slova:
suppletion; gaps; tense; aspect; morphosyntax

Stránky:
40–70
Reference

Almeida, Matthew. 1985. A Description of Konkani (India). Washington DC: Georgetown University.

Blau, Joyce – Barak, Veysi. 1999. Manuel de kurde: kurmanji. Paris: L'Harmattan.

Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2012. Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.

Bobaljik, Jonathan – Wurmbrand, Susi. 2013. Suspension across Domains. In: Matushansky, Ora – Marantz, Alec (eds.), Distributed Morphology Today, 185–197. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Boland, Johanna Hendrika Geertruida. 2006. Aspect, Tense and Modality: Theory, Typology, Acquisition, Vol. 1. Utrecht: LOT.

Bradley, Peter – Mackenzie, Ian. 2004. Spanish: An Essential Grammar. London/New York: Routledge.

Burzio, Luigi. 1998. Multiple correspondence. Lingua 104(1–2): 79–109.

Bybee, Joan – Dahl, Östen. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13(1): 51–103.

Calabrese, Andrea. 2019. Morpho-Phonological Investigations: A Theory of PF. From Syntax to Phonology in Sanskrit and Italian Verbal Systems. Unpublished manuscript. Storrs CT: University of Connecticut.

Camaj, Martin. 1984. Albanian Grammar: With Exercises, Chrestomathy and Glossaries. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.

Christopoulos, Christos – Zompì, Stanislao. 2023. Taking the nominative (back) out of the accusative: Case features and the distribution of stems in Indo-European paradigms. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 41(3): 879–909.

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2014. Again on tense, aspect, mood morpheme order and the 'mirror principle'. In: Svenonius, Peter (ed.), Functional Structure from Top to Toe: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 232–265. New York: Oxford University Press.

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. New York: Blackwell.

Dahl, Östen. 2000. The tense-aspect systems of European languages in a typological perspective. In: Dahl, Östen (ed.), Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, 3–26. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Duchet, Jean-Louis. 1995. The Albanian tense systém. In: Thieroff, Rolf (ed.), Tense Systems in European Languages II, 1–36. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer.

De Clercq, Karen – Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido. 2017. *ABA revisited: Evidence from Czech and Latin degree morphology. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 2(1): 69.

De Wit, Astrid. 2016. The Present Perfective Paradox across Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Degener, Almuth. 1998. Die Sprache von Nisheygram im afghanischen Hindukusch. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.

Dum-Tragut, Jasmine. 2009. Armenian. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Eckhoff, Hanne – Janda, Laura – Nesset, Tore. 2014. Old Church Slavonic "byti" part one: Grammatical profiling analysis. The Slavic and East European Journal 58(3): 482–497.

Embick, David. 2012. Contextual conditions on stem alternations. In: Franco, Irene – Lusini, Sara – Saab, Andrés (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2010: Selected Papers from 'Going Romance' Leiden 2010, 21–40. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Embick, David. 2016. On the distribution of stem alternants: Separation and its limits. In: Luís, Ana – Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (eds.), The Morphome Debate, 276–305. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ganenkov, Dmitry. 2018. The ABA pattern in Nakh-Daghestanian pronominal inflection. Snippets 34: 11–13.

Gouskova, Maria – Bobaljik, Jonathan. To appear. Allomorphy and vocabulary insertion. In: Alexiadou, Artemis – Kramer, Ruth – Marantz, Alec – Oltra-Massuet, Isabel (eds.), Handbook of Distributed Morphology. Cambridge University Press.

Halle, Morris – Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In: Hale, Ken – Keyser, Samuel Jay (eds.), The View from Building 20, 111–176. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Holton, David – Peter Mackridge – Irene Philippaki-Warburton – Vassilios Spyropoulos. 2012. Greek: A Comprehensive Grammar of the Modern Language. London/ New York: Routledge.

Huntley, David. 1993. Old Church Slavonic. In Corbett, Greville – Comrie, Bernard (eds), The Slavonic Languages, 125–187. London/New York: Routledge.

Hutchinson, Amélia – Lloyd, Janet. 2003. Portuguese: An Essential Grammar. New York/London: Routledge.

Jahani, Carina. 2019. A Grammar of Modern Standard Balochi. Uppsala: Acta Uni-versitatis Upsaliensis.

Johanson, Lars. 2000. Viewpoint operators in European languages. In: Dahl, Östen (ed.), Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, 27–187. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Julien, Marit. 2002. Syntactic Heads and Word Formation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Khromov, Albert. 1972. Jagnobskij jazyk. Moscow: Nauka.

Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. Elsewhere in phonology. In: Anderson, Stephen – Kiparsky, Paul (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 93–106. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Klein, Jared. 2007. Classical Armenian morphology. In: Kaye, Alan (ed.), Morphologies of Asia and Africa, 2: 1051–86. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.

Mace, John. 2003. Persian Grammar: For Reference and Revision. London/New York: Routledge.

Maiden, Martin. 2018. The Romance Verb: Morphomic Structure and Diachrony. New York: Oxford University Press.

Maiden, Martin – Cecilia Robustelli. 2007. A Reference Grammar of Modern Italian. London/New York: Routledge.

Malchukov, Andrej. 2009. Incompatible categories: Resolving the "present perfective paradox". In: Hogeweg, Lotte – de Hoop, Helen – Malchukov, Andrej (eds.), Cross-Linguistic Semantics of Tense, Aspect, and Modality. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Malchukov, Andrej. 2011. Interaction of verbal categories: Resolution of infelicitous grammeme combinations. Linguistics 49(1): 229–282.

Matras, Yaron. 2012. A grammar of Domari. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.

Migdalski, Krzysztof. 2006. The Syntax of Compound Tenses in Slavic. Utrecht: LOT.

Moskal, Beata. 2015. Domains on the Border: Between Morphology and Phonology. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.

Moskal, Beata. 2018. Excluding exclusively the exclusive: Suppletion patterns in clusivity. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3(1): 130.

Novák, Ľubomír. 2019. Verbal Suppletion in Yaghnōbī. In: Kim, Ronald (ed.), Diachronic Perspectives on Suppletion. Hamburg: Baar-Verlag.

Pérez Bouza, José. 1996. El Gallego. Newcastle: LINCOM Europa.

Pertsova, Katya. 2022. A case for a binary feature underlying clusivity: The possibility of ABA. Morphology 32(4): 389–429.

Pomino, Natascha – Remberger, Eva-Maria. 2019. Verbal suppletion in Romance synchrony and diachrony: The perspective of Distributed Morphology. Transactions of the Philological Society 117( 3): 471–497.

Pomino, Natascha – Remberger, Eva-Maria. 2022. Romance root suppletion and cumulative exponence: Fusion, pruning, spanning. Languages 7(3): 161.

Price, Glanville. 2008. A comprehensive French grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.

Riga, Stratigoula. 2019. A ghrussa namu: I rimatiki klisi tis Tsakonikis dhialektou. Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistics Theory 8(1): 287–302.

Rizzi, Luigi – Cinque, Guglielmo. 2016. Functional categories and syntactic theory. Annual Review of Linguistics 2: 139–163.

Robson, Barbara – Tegey, Habibullah. 2009. Pashto. In: Windfuhr, Gernot (ed.), The Iranian languages, 797–848. London and New York: Routledge.

Scatton, Ernest. 1993. Bulgarian. In: Comrie, Bernard – Corbett, Greville (eds.), The Slavonic Languages, 188–248. London/New York: Routledge.

Smith, Peter – Moskal, Beata – Xu, Ting – Kang, Jungmin – Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2019. Case and number suppletion in pronouns. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 37: 1029–1101.

Thieroff, Rolf. 2000. On the areal distribution of tense-aspect categories in Europe. In: Dahl, Östen (ed.), Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido – Starke, Michal – De Clercq, Karen – Caha, Pavel. 2020. How to be positive. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5(1): 23.

Veselinova, Ljuba. 2006. Suppletion in Verb Paradigms. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Viti, Carlotta. 2020. Synthetic and analytic structures for tense and aspect in Indo-Eu-ropean. In: Bubenik, Vit – Drinka, Bridget – Hewson, John – Šefčik, Ondřej (eds.), Exploring Universals of Tense and Aspect, 113–140. Hamburg: Baar.

Windfuhr, Gernot – Perry, John. 2009. Persian and Tajik. In: Windfuhr, Gernot (ed.), The Iranian Languages, 416‒544. London/New York: Routledge.

Metriky

0

Crossref logo

30

Views

0

PDF (angličtina) views