Řízení virtuálních týmů: manažerská a organizační perspektiva

Roč.2,č.2(2010)
Informační vzdělávání a informační gramotnost

Petr Škyřík

https://doi.org/10.5817/ProIn2010-2-13

Jak citovat:
Škyřík, P. (2010). Řízení virtuálních týmů: manažerská a organizační perspektiva. ProInflow, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5817/ProIn2010-2-13
PDF
Abstrakt

Hlavním cílem příspěvku je představit pilotní návrh modelu „Virtual Development Management System“ (ViDeMaS), který umožní efektivnější řízení a rozvoj virtuálních týmů. Řízení a rozvoj virtuálních týmů není jednoduchý koncept. Je souhrnem poznatků z mnoha oblastí a vědních disciplín. Složitost konceptu není možné zjednodušovat, jelikož je naprosto nezbytná k plnému pochopení podstaty. Aby bylo možné se ve složitosti konceptu lépe orientovat, využijeme při popisu modelu různé perspektivy pohledu, které nám umožní dosáhnout cíle práce a předložit hlavní výsledky práce (vytvoření modelu pro Virtual Development Management System). Příspěvek tedy v různých perspektivách popisuje návrh modelu dostatečně podrobného a komplexního, který bude využitelný a přínosný jak v teoretické, tak i aplikační rovině.

Management of Virtual Teams: Managerial and Organizational Perspective

The main aim of this paper is to present a pilot proposal of a model of ’Virtual Development Management System’ (ViDeMaS) which will facilitate more effective management and development of virtual teams. Management and development of virtual teams is not a simple concept. It comprises a body of knowledge from a number of fields and scientific disciplines. The complexity of the concept may not be simplified as it is absolutely essential for full understanding of its nature. In order to gain better orientation in the concept, different perspectives will be used in the description of the model, which will enable us to achieve the goal of the work and to present the main results of the work (creation of a model for Virtual Development Management System). The present paper thus describes from different perspectives the proposal of a sufficiently detailed and complex model that may be utilized both on theoretical and application level.

 

Petr Škyřík

Kabinet informačních studií a knihovnictví na Masarykově univerzitě v Brně


Klíčová slova:
virtuální tým; virtuální práce; virtualita; týmová práce; technologicky zprostředkovaná komunikace
Reference

  1. ARMSTRONG, D. L.; COLE, P. Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work Gross. In JACKSON, S.; RUDERMAN, M. (Eds). Diversity in Work Teams : Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace. Washington, DC : American Psychological Association, 1995, s. 497-529.
  2. ARMSTRONG, M. Performace management: Key strategies and practical guidelines. Second edition. London : Kogan Page, 2000, s. 1 a 2.
  3. ASHKANASY N. M.; WILDEROM, C. P. M.; PETERSON, M. F. Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate. Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications, Inc., 2000. ISBN 0-7619-1602-4.
  4. BACAL, R. Performance management. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1999, s. 4.
  5. BAHBOUH, Radvan; BAHBOUH, Kamil. Sociomapování: metoda analýzy socioekonomických systémů. Psychologie v ekonomické praxi. 2002, roč. 37, č. 3-4, s. 191-198.
  6. BALTES, B. B. [et al]. J. Computermediated communication and group decision-making: a meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2002, vol. 87, s. 156-79. | DOI 10.1006/obhd.2001.2961
  7. BECKMAN, T. J. The current State of Knowledge Management. In LIEBOWITZ, J. Knowledge management Handbook. Boca Raton : CRC PRESS, 1999.
  8. BELLARBY, L.; ORANGE, G. Knowledge sharing through communities of practice in the voluntary sector. In COAKES, E.; CLARKE, S. Encyclopedia of communities of practice in information and knowledge management. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference, 2006.
  9. BENBUNAN-FICH, R.; HILTZ, S. R.; TUROFF, M. A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs asynchronous group decision-making. Decision Support Systems. 2002, vol. 34, s. 457-69. | DOI 10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00072-6
  10. BENTLEY, R. [et al]. Architectural Support for Cooperative Multiuser Interfaces. IEEE Computer Society Press [online]. 1993. Citované podle: KOCH, T. Groupware on the Internet. IICM [online]. 1998.
  11. BONTIS, N. [et al]. The knowledge toolbox: a review of the tools available to measure and manager intangible resources. European Management Journal. 1999, vol. 17, iss. 4, s. 391 – 402.
  12. BORGHHOFF, U. M.; PARESCHI, R. Why Knowledge? In Information Technology for Knowledge Management. Berlin : Springer, 1998.
  13. BOUAS, K. S.; ARROW, H. The development of group identity in computer and face-to-face groups with membership change. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 1996, vol. 4, s. 153-78.
  14. BELL, Bradford S.; KOZLOWSKI, Steve W. J. The Typology of Virtual Teams, Implications for Effective Leadersip. Group & Organization Management. 2002, vol. 27, no. 1, s. 14-49. | DOI 10.1177/1059601102027001003
  15. BUREŠ, Vladimír. Znalostní management a proces jeho zavádění. 1. vyd. Praha : Grada Publishing, 2007. 216 s. ISBN 978-80-247-1978-8.
  16. BUSCH, Peter Anthony; RICHARDS, Debbie; DAMPNEY, C. N. G. Kit. Visual mapping of articulable tacit knowledge. In Confereces in Research and Practice in Information Technology [online]. December 2001, vol. 9 [cit. 2010-04-27]. Dostupné z www: http://www.acs.org.au/documents/public/crpit/CRPITV9Busch.pdf.
  17. CABALLER, A., GRACIA, F.; PEIRÓ, J. M. Affective responses to work processes and outcomes in virtual teams: Effects of communication media and time pressure. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2005, vol. 20, s. 245-60. | DOI 10.1108/02683940510589037
  18. CAJTHAMER, Václav. Virtualita a virtuální tým. In CAJTHAMER, Václav; DĚDINA, Jiří; THORTON, Richard. Virtuální týmy a virtuální organizace. Praha : Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, Oeconomica, 2009. s. 83. ISBN 978-80-245-1611-0.
  19. CANNEY DAVIDSON, S.; WARD, K. Leading International Teams. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill International, 1999.
  20. CARLSON, J. R.; GEORGE, J. F. Media appropriatedness in the conduct and discovery of deceptive communication: the relative influence of richness and synchronicity. Group Decision and Negotiation. 2004, vol. 13, s. 191-210.
  21. COLLIS, J.; HUSSEY, R. Business Research. A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students. 2. vyd. New York : Palgrave MacMillan, 2003. 374 s. ISBN 0-333-98325-4.
  22. Coordination in Global Virtual Project Teams. Journal of Management information Systems. 2003, vol. 19, no. 4, s. 132-139.
  23. COUROS, A. Examining the open movement: Possibilities and implications for education. University of Regina. Doctoral dissertation. Dostupné také z: http://educationaltechnology.ca/couros/publications/unpublishedpapers/communities_practice.pdf.
  24. CURSEU, P. L.; SCHRUIJER, S. G. L.; BOROS, S. The effects of groups' variety and disparity on groups' cognitive komplexity. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice. 2007, vol. 11, no. 3, s. 187-206. | DOI 10.1037/1089-2699.11.3.187
  25. CURSEU, P. L. Emergent states in virtual teams. A complex adaptive systems perspective. Journal of Information Technology. 2006, vol. 21, no. 4, s. 249-61. | DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000077
  26. CURSEU, P. L.; SCHALK, R.; WESSEL, I. How do virtual teams process information? A literature review and implications for management. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2008, vol. 23, iss. 6, s. 628 – 652. | DOI 10.1108/02683940810894729
  27. DAFT, R. L.; LENGEL, R. H. Information richness : a new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. Research in Organizational Behavior. 1984, vol. 6, s. 191-233.
  28. DENISON, D. R. Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. New York : John Wiley & Sons, 1990. ISBN 0-471-80021-X.
  29. DENNIS, A. R. Information exchange and use in group decision making : you can lead a group to information, but you can't make it think. MIS Quarterly. 1996, vol. 20, December, s. 433-57. | DOI 10.2307/249563
  30. DENNIS, A. R.; WIXOM, B. H.; VANDENBERG, R. J. Understanding fit and approximation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quarterly. 2001, vol. 25, s. 167-93. | DOI 10.2307/3250928
  31. DESANCTIS, G.; POOLE, M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use : adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science. 1994, vol. 5, s. 121-47. | DOI 10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
  32. EBRAHIM, Nader Ale; AHMED, Shamsuddin; TAHA, Zahari. Virtual Teams : a Literature Review. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2009, 3 (3), s. 2653-2669. ISSN 1991-8178.
  33. GANGULI A.; MOSTASHARI A. Virtual Teams : An Overview of the Literature. COMPASS Working Paper Series WPS 2008-03, May 2008.
  34. GAPPMAIER, M. Process Prototyping – A Methodology for Participatory Business Process Design. In IDIMT 97 – 5th Interdisciplinary Information Management Talks, Oldenbourg Wien/Munchen.
  35. GEISLER, C. Virtual teams [online]. 2002. Dostupné z: http://www.newfoundations.com/OrgTheory/Geisler721.html.
  36. GIBBONS, A. M. [et al]. A preliminary investigation of development dimensions. The Psychologist – Manager Journal. 2006, s. 99 – 123.
  37. GOODHUE, D.; THOMPSON, R. L. Task technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly. 1995, vol. 19, s. 213-36. | DOI 10.2307/249689
  38. HENDL, J. Kvalitativní výzkum. Základní teorie, metody a aplikace. 2. vyd. Praha: Portál, 2000. 408 s. ISBN 978-80-7367-485-4.
  39. HERTEL, G.; GEISTER, S.; KONRADT, U. Managing virtual teams : a review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review. 2005, vol. 15, s. 69-95. | DOI 10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.002
  40. HINDS, P. J.; BAILEY, D. E. Out of sight, out of sync : understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science. 2003, vol. 14, s. 615-32. | DOI 10.1287/orsc.14.6.615.24872
  41. HLINKA, Jaroslav. Možnosti sociomapování jako metody zachycení struktury sociální skupiny. Praha : Univerzita Karlova, 2005. 68 s. Práce SVOČ.
  42. HRONÍK, František. Hodnocení zaměstnanců. Vyd. 1. Praha : Grada, 2006. 128 s. ISBN 80-247-1458-2.
  43. JACKSON, S. E.; MAY, K. E.; WHITNEY, K. Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision making teams. In GUZZO, R. A.; SALAS, E. (Eds). Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations. San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass, 1995, s. 204-61.
  44. JANČÍKOVÁ, Alexandra. Organizační kultura a řízení kvality. Brno : Masarykova univerzita, 2008. 201 s. Dizertační práce.
  45. JARVENPAA, S. L.; LEIDNER, D. E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science. 1999, vol. 10, s. 791-865. | DOI 10.1287/orsc.10.6.791
  46. JARVENPAA, S. L.; SHAW, T. R.; STAPLES, D. S. Toward contextualized theories of trust : the role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research. 2004, vol. 15, s. 250-67.
  47. JUHAŇÁK, Libor. Problematika virtuální týmové práce. Brno, 2009. 48 s. Bakalářská práce. Vedoucí práce Petr Škyřík, Masarykova univerzita Brno.
  48. KANAWATTANACHAI, P.; YOO, Y. Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2002, vol. 11, s. 187-213. | DOI 10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00019-7
  49. KARAHANNA, E.; EVARISTO, J. R.; SRITE, M. Levels of Culture and Individual Behaviour : An Integrative Perspective. Journal of Global Information Management. Svazek duben - červen, 2005. | DOI 10.4018/jgim.2005040101
  50. KAYWORTH, T. R.; LEIDNER, D. E. The global virtual manager : a prescription for Access. European Management Journal. 2000, vol. 18, s. 183-94. | DOI 10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00090-0
  51. KIRKMAN, B. L. [et al]. The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance : the moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal. 2004, vol. 47, s. 175-92. | DOI 10.2307/20159571
  52. KOCH, T. Groupware on the Internet. IICM [online]. 1998 [cit. 10. dubna 2009]. Dostupný na WWW: http://www.iicm.tugraz.at/thesis/koch.
  53. KRAUSE, D. S.; GEBERT, D. A comparison of assessment center practices in organizations in German-speaking regions and United states. Internacional Journal of Selection and Assessment. 2003, vol. 11, iss. 4, s. 297-312. | DOI 10.1111/j.0965-075X.2003.00253.x
  54. KRISTOF, A. L. [et al]. The virtual team; a case-study and inductive model. In BEYERLEIN, M. M.; BEYERLEIN, S. T.; Johnson, D. A. (Eds). Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams : Knowledge Work in Teams, Vol. 2. Greenwich CT : JAI Press, 1995, s. 229-53.
  55. KUBÁTOVÁ, Jaroslava. Řízení virtuálních týmů. Zlín: Univerzita Tomáše Bati ve Zlíně, 2008. 244 s. Habilitační práce.
  56. LIPNACK, J.; STAMPS, J. Virtual Teams. Reaching Across Space, Time and Organizations with Technology. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1997.
  57. LUCENA, C. J. P. et al. Communication, coordination, and cooperation in computersupported leasing : The AulaNet Experience. In NETO, F. M. M.; BRASILEIRO, F. V. Advances in computer-supported learning. London: Idea Group Inc, 2006, s. 274-297. ISBN 1-59904-356-4.
  58. LUEG, C. Where is the action in virtual communities of practice? Presentation at the Workshop Communication and Cooperation in Knowledge Communities, at the German Computer-Supported Cooperative Work Conference (D-CSCW), Munich, Germany, 2000. Dostupné z: http://www-staff.it.uts.edu.au/~lueg/papers/commdcscw00.pdf.
  59. LUKÁŠOVÁ, R.; NOVÝ, I. a kol. Organizační kultura : od sdílených hodnot a cílů k vyšší výkonnosti podniku. Praha: Grada, 2004. ISBN 80-247-0648-2.
  60. LUREY, J. S.; RAISINGHANI, M. S. An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams. Information and Management. 2001, vol. 38, s. 523-44.
  61. MARTINS, L. L.; GILSON, L. L.; MAYNARD, M. T. Virtual teams : what do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management. 2004, vol. 30, s. 805-35.
  62. MARUPING, L. M.; AGARWAL, R. Managing team interpersonal processes through technology : a task-technology fit perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2004, vol. 89, sp. 975-90. | DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.975
  63. MAZNEVSKI, M. L.; CHUDOBA, K. M. Bridging space over time : global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science. 2000, vol. 11, s. 473-92.jj | DOI 10.1287/orsc.11.5.473.15200
  64. MCDONOUGH, E. F. III; KAHN, K. B.; BARCZAK, G. An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and collocated new product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2001, vol. 18, s. 110-20. | DOI 10.1016/S0737-6782(00)00073-4
  65. MLÁDKOVÁ, Ludmila. Management of Tacit Knowledge in Organization. Economics and management. 2007, s. 803-808. ISSN 1822-6515.
  66. MOLNÁR, Zdeněk. Úvod do základů vědecké práce : sylabus pro potřeby semináře doktorandů. Zlín : [s.n.], 2007. 22 s.
  67. MONTOYA-WEISS, M.; MASSEY, A.; SONG, M. Getting it together : temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal. 2001, vol. 44, s. 1251-62. | DOI 10.2307/3069399
  68. MUSIL, J. V. Sociometrie v psychologické kognici. 1. vyd. Olomouc: Vydavatelství University Palackého, 2003. 363 s. 80-238-8935-4 (brož.).
  69. ORTIZ DE GUINEA, A.; WEBSTER, J.; STAPLES, S. A Meta-Analysis of the Virtual Teams Literature. Symposium on High Performance Professional Teams Industrial Relations Centre. School of Policy Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada, 2005.
  70. OWEN, John Mackenzie. Tacit knowledge in action : basic notions of knowledge sharing in computer supported work environments. In European CSCW Workshop on "Managing tacit knowledge" [online]. September 16, 2001 [cit. 2010-04-27]. Dostupné z www: http://dare.uva.nl/document/14964.
  71. PALMER, J.; SPEIER, C.; PRICE, M. F. Teams : virtualness and media choice. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 1998, 3 (1), s. 27-48. Dostupné z: http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/1998/8242/04/82420131.pdf.
  72. PAVLICA, K. a kol. Sociální výzkum, podnik a management. 1. vyd. Praha: Ekopress, 2000. 161 s. ISBN 80-86119-25-4.
  73. PISSARA, J.; JESUINO, J. C. Idea generation through computer mediated communication : The effects of annonimity. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2005, vol. 20, s. 275-91. | DOI 10.1108/02683940510589055
  74. POOLE, M. S. [et al]. Group decision support systems and group communication : A comparison of group decision-making in computer-supported and non supported Gross. Communication Research. 1993, vol. 20, s. 176-213. | DOI 10.1177/009365093020002002
  75. POSPÍŠIL, Martin. Groupware ako základ pre CRM – porovnanie ponuky na trhu. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2008. 50 s. Bakalářská práce.
  76. POWELL, A.; PICCOLI, G.; IVES, B. Virtual Teams : A Review of Current Literature and Directions for Future Research. Database for Advances in Information Systems. 2004, 35 (1), s. 6-36.
  77. PSTRUŽINA, K. Atlas filosofie vědy [on-line]. Praha: Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2002 [cit. 6. 6. 2010]. Dostupné z WWW: http://nb.vse.cz/kfil/Win/atlas1/atlas3.htm.
  78. RICO, R.; COHEN, S. G. Effects of task interdependence and type of communication on performance in virtual teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2005, vol. 20, s. 261-74. | DOI 10.1108/02683940510589046
  79. ŘEPA, Václav. Podnikové procesy : Procesní řízení a modelování. 2. vyd. Praha : Grada Publishing, 2007. 288 s. ISBN 978-80-247-2252-8.
  80. SCHEIN, E. H. Corporate Culture - Survival Guide. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers, 1999. ISBN 0-13-272220-8.
  81. SCHEIN, E. H. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers, 1992. ISBN 1-55542-487-2.
  82. SCHIPPMANN, J. S. [et al]. The Practice of Competency Modelin. Personnel Psychology. 2000, 53, s. 703-740.
  83. SCHMIDT, J. B.; MONTOYA-WEISS, M. M.; MASSEY, A. P. New product development decision-making effectiveness : comparing individuals, face-to-face teams and virtual teams. Decision Sciences. 2001, vol. 32, s. 575-99. | DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00973.x
  84. SOBRERO, Patricia M. Social Learning Through Virtual Teams and Communities. Extension Journal. 2008, vol. 46, no. 3, s. 46-60. Dostupný také z WWW: http://www.joe.org/joe/2008june/a1.php. ISSN 1077-5315.
  85. SPROULL, L.; KIESLER, S. Reducing social context cues : electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science. 1986, vol. 32, s. 1492-512. | DOI 10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492
  86. TETT, R. P. [et al]. Development and content validation of a "hyperdimensional" taxonomy of managerial competence. Human Performance. 2000, 13, s. 205-251.
  87. TOWNSEND, A. M.; DEMARIE, S. M.; HENDRICKSON, A. R. Virtual teams : technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Executive. 1998, vol. 12, s. 17-29.
  88. VACULÍK, Martin. Assessment centrum : Psychologie ve výběru a rozvoji lidí. 1. vyd. Brno: NC Publishing, 2010. 202 s. ISBN 978-80-903858-8-7.
  89. VOSKUIJL, O. Job analysis: current and future perspectives. In EVERS, A.; ANDERSON, N.; VOSKUIJL, O. (Eds.). The Blackwell Handbook of Personal Selection. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2005.
  90. WAGNEROVÁ, Irena. Hoganovy testy v personálně-psychologické praxi. Psychologie v ekonomické praxi. 2008, 41, s. 23-41. ISSN 0033-300X.
  91. WARKENTIN, M. E.; BERANEK, P. M. Training to improve virtual team communication. Information Systems Journal. 1999, vol. 9, s. 271-89. | DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2575.1999.00065.x
  92. WENGER, E. C.; SNYDER, W. M. Communities of practice : the organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review. 2000, s. 139-145.
  93. WHITMORE, John. Koučování : Rozvoj osobnosti a zvyšování výkonnosti. Praha: Management Press, 2007. 168 s. ISBN 978-80-7261-101-0.
  94. WILSON, P. Computer Supported Cooperative Work : An Introduction. 1st Edition Oxford, UK: Intellect Books, 1991. 132 s. ISBN 0-792-31446-8.
  95. ZARB, M. P. Modeling participation in virtual communities-of-practice [online]. 2006. Master Dissertation. Dostupný z: http://www.mzarb.com/Modelling_Participation_in_Virtual_Communities-of-Practice.pdf.
  96. ZIGURS, I. Leadership in virtual tams : oxymoron or opportunity? Organizational Dynamics. 2003, vol. 31, s. 339-51.
  97. ZIGURS, I.; BUCKLAND, B. K. A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly. 1998, vol. 22, s. 313-33. | DOI 10.2307/249668

Metriky

145

Views

64

PDF views

Copyright © 0 ProInflow

PDF