“I’ll have everything in diamonds!”: Students’ Experiences With Minecraft at School
Roč.23,č.4(2018)
Studia paedagogica: Digital Youth and Their Ways of Learning
digital games; formative intervention; classroom research; case study; motivation
[1] Abrams, S. S. (2017). Emotionally crafted experiences: Layering literacies in Minecraft. The Reading Teacher, 70(4), 501–506. | DOI 10.1002/trtr.1515
[2] Beavis, C., Muspratt, S., & Thompson, R. (2015). 'Computer games can get your brain working': Student experience and perceptions of digital games in the classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 21–42. | DOI 10.1080/17439884.2014.904339
[3] Bebbington, S., & Vellino, A. (2015). Can playing Minecraft improve teenagers' information agency? Journal of Information Literacy, 9(2), 6–26. | DOI 10.11645/9.2.2029
[4] Callaghan, N. (2016). Investigating the role of Minecraft in educational learning environments. Educational Media International, 53(4), 244–260. | DOI 10.1080/09523987.2016.1254877
[5] Canossa, A., Martinez, J. B., & Togelius, J. (2013). Give me a reason to dig Minecraft and psychology of motivation. In 2013 IEEE Computational Intelligence in Games (CIG) (pp. 1–8). doi: 10.1109/CIG.2013.6633612 | DOI 10.1109/CIG.2013.6633612
[6] Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Los Angeles: SAGE.
[7] Cipollone, M., Schiffer, C. C., & Moffat, R. A. (2014). Minecraft as a creative tool. A case study. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 4(2), 1–14. | DOI 10.4018/ijgbl.2014040101
[8] Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
[9] Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
[10] Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[11] Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding. An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[12] Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24. | DOI 10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002
[13] Fetterman, D. M. (2010). Ethnography. Step by step (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
[14] Gallagher, C. (2015). Minecraft in the classroom. Ideas, inspiration, and student projects for teachers. San Francisco: Peachpit Press.
[15] Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo ludens. A study of the play-element in culture. Boston: The Bacon Press.
[16] Jahnke, I., Nordqvist, L., & Olsson, A. (2014). Digital didactical design of learning expedition. In C. Rensing, S. de Freitas, T. Ley, & P. J. Muños-Merino (Eds.), Open learning and teaching in educational communities: 9th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2014, Graz, Austria, September 16–19, 2014, Proceedings (pp. 165–178). Cham: Springer.
[17] Jessen, C. (2011). Learning games and the disruptive effects of play. In S. Egenfeldt-Nielsen, B. Meyer, & B. H. Sørensen (Eds.), Serious games in education: A global perspective (pp. 153–169). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
[18] Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Det kvalitative forskningsintervju. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
[19] Leontjev, A. N. (2002). Virksomhed, bevidsthed, personlighed. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
[20] Mail, T. M. (2015). In-game Minecraft quests for elementary education. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 3(8), 167–174.
[21] Marklund, B. B., Backlund, P., & Johannesson, M. (2013). Children's collaboration in emergent game environments. In G. N. Yannakakis, E. Aarseth, K. Jørgensen, & J. C. Lester (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG 2013) (pp. 306–313). Santa Cruz: Society for the Advancement of the Science of Digital Games.
[22] Nebel, S., Schneider, S., & Rey, G. D. (2016). Mining learning and crafting scientific experiments: A literature review on the use of Minecraft in education and research. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 355–366.
[23] NESH (The National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities). (2016). Guidelines for research ethics in the social sciences, humanities, law and theology. Retrieved from https://www.etikkom.no/globalassets/documents/english-publications/60127_fek_guidelines_nesh_digital_corr.pdf
[24] Niemeyer, D. J., & Gerber, H. R. (2015). Maker culture and Minecraft: Implications for the future of learning. Educational Media International, 52(3), 216–226. | DOI 10.1080/09523987.2015.1075103
[25] Nilsen, H. (2010). Norwegian school for the future. Struggle between materialism and humanism. In E. Perzycka (Ed.), Towards a better school: International perspectives (pp. 23–30). Boise: Educational Research Consulting.
[26] Norwegian Media Authority. (2016). Barn og medier 2016: 9–16 åringers bruk av opplevelser av medier. Retrieved from https://www.medietilsynet.no/globalassets/publikasjoner/barn-og-medierundersokelser/2016_barnogmedier.pdf
[27] Norwegian Media Authority. (2018). Barn og medier-undersøkelsen 2018. Retrieved from https://www.medietilsynet.no/barn-og-medier/barn-og-medier-undersokelsen/
[28] Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundation of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258–283. | DOI 10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533
[29] Postholm, M. B. (2010). Kvalitativ metode. En innføring med fokus på fenomenologi, etnografi og kasusstudier (2nd ed.). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
[30] Postholm, M. B. (2015). Methodology in cultural-historical activity theory: The example of school-based development. Educational Research, 57(1), 43–58. | DOI 10.1080/00131881.2014.983723
[31] Postholm, M. B., & Smith, K. (2017). Praksisrettet forskning og formativ intervensjonsforskning: Forskning for utvikling av praksisfeltet og vitenskapelig kunnskap. In S. Gjøtterud, H. Hiim, D. Husebø, L. H. Jensen, T. H. Steen-Olsen, & E. Stjernestrøm (Eds.), Aksjonsforskning i Norge. Teoretisk og empirisk mangfold (pp. 71–94). Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
[32] Reiss, S. (2012). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Teaching of Psychology, 39(2), 152–156. | DOI 10.1177/0098628312437704
[33] Sáez-López, J.-M., Miller, J., Vázquez-Cano, E., & Domínguez-Garrido, M.-C. (2015). Exloring application, attitudes and integration of video vames: MinecraftEdu in middle school. Educational Technolog y & Society, 18(3), 114–128.
[34] Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
[35] Turkay, S., Hoffman, D., Kinzer, C. K., Chantes, P., & Vicari, C. (2014). Toward understanding the potential of games for learning: Learning theory, game design characteristics, and situating video games in classrooms. Computers in the Schools, 31(1–2), 2–22. | DOI 10.1080/07380569.2014.890879
[36] Virkkunen, J., & Newnham, D. S. (2013). The change laboratory. A tool for collaborative development of work and education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
[37] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in the society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[38] Willett, R. (2016). 'Microsoft bought Minecraft... who knows what's going to happen?!': A sociocultural analysis of 8–9–year–olds' understanding of commercial online gaming industries. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(1), 101–116. | DOI 10.1080/17439884.2016.1194296
[39] Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research. Design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Copyright © 2019 Studia paedagogica