Analysis of Different Categories of Epistemic and Metacognitive Discourse in Argumentation

[1] Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518–542. | DOI 10.1002/sce.20432

[2] Andriessen, J. (2006). Arguing to learn. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 443–459). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[3] Barzilai, S., & Chinn, C. A. (2018). On the goals of epistemic education: Promoting apt epistemic performance. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(3), 353–389. | DOI 10.1080/10508406.2017.1392968

[4] Barzilai, S., & Ka'adan, I. (2017). Learning to integrate divergent information sources: The interplay of epistemic cognition and epistemic metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 12(2), 193–232. | DOI 10.1007/s11409-016-9165-7

[5] Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2012). Epistemic thinking in action: Evaluating and integrating online sources. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 39–85. | DOI 10.1080/07370008.2011.636495

[6] Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2014). Reconsidering personal epistemology as metacognition: A multifaceted approach to the analysis of epistemic thinking. Educational Psychologist, 49(1), 13–35. | DOI 10.1080/00461520.2013.863265

[7] Blank, L. M. (2000). A metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for student understanding? Science Education, 84(4), 486–506. | DOI 10.1002/1098-237X(200007)84:4<486::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-U

[8] Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology, (pp. 77–165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

[9] Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. | DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

[10] Hefter, M. H., Renkl, A., Riess, W., Schmid, S., Fries, S., & Berthold, K. (2015). Effects of a training intervention to foster precursors of evaluativist epistemological understanding and intellectual values. Learning and Instruction, 39(5), 11–22. | DOI 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.05.002

[11] Hogan, K. (2000). Exploring a process view of students' knowledge about the nature of science. Science Education, 84(1), 51–70. | DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<51::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-H

[12] Chinn, C. A., Barzilai, S., & Duncan, R. G. (Under Review). Disagreeing about how to know: The instructional value of explorations into knowing. [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Educational Psychologist.

[13] Chinn, C. A., Rinehart, R. W., & Buckland, L. A. (2014). Epistemic cognition and evaluating information: Applying the AIR model of epistemic cognition. In D. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 425-453). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[14] Johnson, R. H. (2000). Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

[15] Kuhn, D., & Dean Jr., D. (2010). Metacognition: A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory Into Practice, 43(4), 268–273. | DOI 10.1207/s15430421tip4304_4

[16] Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521. | DOI 10.1002/tea.10034

[17] Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1–5). Cambridge, MA: Bradford.

[18] Perelman, C. H., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (2000). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

[19] Reznitskaya, A., & Gregory, M. (2013). Student thought and classroom language: Examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching. Educational Psychologist, 48(2), 114–133. | DOI 10.1080/00461520.2013.775898

[20] Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634–656. | DOI 10.1002/sce.20065

[21] Schwarz, C. V., & White, B. Y. (2005). Metamodeling knowledge: Developing students' understanding of scientific modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 165–205. | DOI 10.1207/s1532690xci2302_1

[22] Sosa, E. (2015). Judgment and agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[23] Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning. New York: Macmillan.

[24] Veenman, M. V., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. | DOI 10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0

[25] Walton, D. (2016). Argument evaluation and evidence. Cham: Springer.