Reflexive Freedom and The Politics of Participation
Vol.26,No.2(2025)
The article presents a theoretical-methodological analysis of the concept of reflexive freedom in relation to the political sphere of its application, with the aim of revealing and clarifying the main political consequences and normative claims that its recognition implies for political theory. The analysis is based on the assumption that particular conceptions of individual freedom as moral autonomy of the individual lead to particular models of politics. In the article, the main thesis is formulated and argued that the philosophical conception of reflexive freedom, in its applicability, programmatically leads to a model of participatory politics. As part of the analysis, the concept of reflexive freedom is compared with the competing concept of negative freedom and its corresponding model of politics, the politics of modus vivendi. The comparison makes it possible to highlight several specificities and particularities of reflexive freedom and politics of participation and, thus, reveal a diametrically different perspective on the phenomenon of individual freedom and the political conditions for its assurance.
deliberative democracy; moral autonomy; normative political theory; politics of participation; reflexive freedom
Adorno, W. T. – Horkheimer, M. (2002): Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Arendt, H. (1961): Between Past and Future. Six Exercises in Political Thought, New York: The Viking Press.
Berlin, I. (2002): Liberty, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ferrara, A. (2002): Reflective Authenticity: Rethinking the Project of Modernity, London: Routledge.
Finley, I. M. (1985): Democracy Ancient and Modern, London: The Hogarth Press.
Fraser, N. (1990): Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy, Social Text 8(25/26), 56–80, available here.
Fraser, N. – Honneth, A. (2003): Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-philosophical Exchange, London: Verso.
Green, J. E. (2011): The Eyes of the People: Democracy in an Age of Spectatorship, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Habermas, J. (1991): The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996): Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1997): Popular Sovereignty as Procedure, in Bohman, J. – Rehg, W. (eds.) Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics, Cambridge: MIT Press, 35–66.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2001): The Philosophy of History, Kitchener: Batoche Books.
Held, D. (2008): Models of Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hobbes, T. (1965): Leviathan, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Honneth, A. (2004): Organized Self-Realization. Some Paradoxes of Individualization, European Journal of Social Theory 7(4), 463–478, available here.
Honneth, A. (2014): Freedom’s Right. The Social Foundations of Democratic Life, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kant, I. (2006): Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace, and History, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Laclau, E. (2007): Emancipation(s), London: Verso.
Lasch, C. (1991): The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations, New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Lomb, S. (2018): Stalin’s Constitution: Soviet Participatory Politics and the Discussion of the 1936 Draft Constitution, London: Routledge.
Marcuse, H. (2004): Technology, War, and Fascism, London: Routledge.
Mead, G. H. (1972): Mind, Self and Society, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Mill, J. S. (2001): On Liberty, Kitchener: Batoche Books.
Okochi, T. (2012): Freedom and Institution: Theory of Justice as Hegelian “Sittlichkeitslehre” in Honneth’s Das Recht der Freiheit, Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Studies 44(1), 9–19, available here.
Pateman, C. (1976): Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Qvortrup, M. (2007): The Politics of Participation: From Athens to e-Democracy, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Rawls, J. (1996): Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.
Rostbøll, F. C. (2008): Deliberative Freedom. Deliberative Democracy as Critical Theory, Albany: State University of New York Press.
Rousseau, J.-J. (1994): Discourse on Political Economy and The Social Contract, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shoikhedbrod, I. (2023): The retrieval of positive freedom, post-Kantian perfectionism and neo-Roman liberty in contemporary political thought, European Journal of Political Theory 24(1), 132–142, available here.
Taylor, C. (2003): The Ethics of Authenticity, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Turčan, C. (2023): The Negative Freedom and Politics of Modus Vivendi, Journal of Education Culture and Society 14(2), 93–104.
Young, I. M. (2001): Equality of Whom? Social Groups and Judgments of Injustice, Journal of Political Philosophy 9(1), 1–18, available here.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2025 Ciprian Turčan