Counting Years of Life: Some Reflections on Numbers Skepticism

Vol.27,No.1(2026)

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss John Taurek’s (1977) famous attempt to undermine the moral significance of numbers in situations in which one is expected to choose whom to save from harm. Taurek famously argued that the number of people affected by one’s choice should not be a morally relevant factor in determining how one should act in conflict cases. While Taurek’s approach has obvious counterintuitive implications, I suggest that one way to avoid them while still preserving the spirit of his argument is to focus on the number of years a person is expected to live.


Keywords:
aggregation; fairness; John Taurek; no-worse claim; numbers; potential life-years
References

Belshaw, C. (2009): Annihilation: The Sense and Significance of Death. Durham: Acumen.

Broome, J. (1998): Kamm on Fairness, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58(4), 955–961.

Gamlund, E. et al. (eds.) (2019): Saving People from the Harm of Death, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Glover, J. (1977): Causing Death and Saving Lives, New York: Penguin Books.

Hare, C. (2013): The Limits of Kindness, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hirose, I. (2007): Weighted Lotteries in Life and Death Cases, Ratio 20(1), 45–56.

Hirose, I. (2015): Moral Aggregation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kamm, F. (1993): Morality, Mortality: Death and Whom to Save from It (Vol I). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 75–98.

Kamm, F. (2007): Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 48–77.

Lawlor, R. (2006): Taurek, Numbers and Probabilities, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9(2), 149–166.

Liao, M. (2008): Who is Afraid of Numbers?, Utilitas 20(4), 447–461

Lübbe, W. (2008): Taurek’s No Worse Claim, Philosophy and Public Affairs 36(1), 69–85.

Otsuka, M. (2000): Scanlon and the claims of the many versus the one, Analysis 60(3), 288–93.

Otsuka, M. (2004): Skepticism about Saving the Greater Number, Philosophy and Public Affairs 32(4), 413–426.

Parfit, D. (1978): Innumerate Ethics, Philosophy and Public Affairs 7(4), 285–301.

Scanlon, T. M. (1998): What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Taurek, J. (1977): Should the Numbers Count?, Philosophy and Public Affairs 6(4), 293–316.

Taurek, J. (2021): Reply to Parfit’s ‘Innumerate Ethics, in McMahan, J. – Campbell, T. – Goodrich, J. – Ramakrishnan, K. (eds.) Principles and Persons: The Legacy of Derek Parfit, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 311–322.

Timmermann, J. (2004): The individualist lottery: how people count but not their numbers, Analysis 64(2), 106–112.

Metrics

0

Crossref logo

0


0

Views

0

PDF views