From Gnosticism to Agnotology : a reply to Robertson and Talmont-Kaminski
Roč.28,č.1(2020)
Abstrakt
Klíčová slova:
Agnotology; Cognitive Historiography; History and Philosophy of Science; History of Religions; pseudoscience; Religious Studies
Stránky:
37–44
This paper is a reply to the commentaries by David G. Robertson and Konrad Talmont-Kaminski on An Unnatural History of Religions: Academia, Post-truth and the Quest for Scientific Knowledge (2019) and published in this same issue of Religio: Revue pro religionistiku. Topics discussed herein include: the need for a consilient and cross-disciplinary research programme for cognitive historiography; pseudoscience in Religious Studies; the epistemological study of disciplinary ignorance-making (or Agnotology); and cross- and inter-disciplinary proposals to support an overhaul of the field's method and theory (i.e., Virtue Epistemology, Virtue Ethics, Philosophy of Expertise, Management Studies, Evolutionary Epistemology, Cognitive Historiography, History and Philosophy of Science).
Agnotology; Cognitive Historiography; History and Philosophy of Science; History of Religions; pseudoscience; Religious Studies
37–44
Tato práce je licencována pod Mezinárodní licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0.