Lucrezio, De rerum natura 5, 1120–1135 : riflessioni e una nuova proposta di trasposizione
Roč.22,č.2(2017)
Lucretius; Epicureanism; textual criticism; textual transmission; transpositions
43–62
Asmis, E. (1983). Rhetoric and reason in Lucretius. American Journal of Philology, 104, 36–66. | DOI 10.2307/293758
Baran, N. V. (1983). Les caractéristiques essentielles du vocabulaire chromatique latin: Aspect général, étapes de développement, sens figurés, valeur stylistique, circulation. In W. Haase (Ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (Vol. II, 29, 1; pp. 321–411). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Blundell, S. (1986). The Origins of Civilization in Greek and Roman Thought. London: Routledge Revivals.
Boerwinkel, E. J. (1956). Burgenschap en individuele autonomie. Epicurus en epicureisme in het oordeel van Lucretius en Cicero (PhD dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit te Utrecht). Paris – Amsterdam.
Butterfield, D. J. (2014). Lucretius auctus? The question of interpolation in De rerum natura. In J. Martinez (Ed.), Fakes and Forgers of Classical Literature. Ergo decipiatur! Leiden: Brill.
Camardese, D. (2008). Lucr. V 1302 e promemoria semantica di taeter. Paideia, 63, 83–105.
Campbell, G. L. (2003). Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De rerum natura 5. 772-1104. Oxford: University Press.
Canfora, L. (1993). Vita di Lucrezio. Palermo: Sellerio.
Canfora, L. (1993a). Lettura del quinto libro del De rerum natura. In Idem (Ed.), Studi di storia della storiografia romana (pp. 291–302). Bari: Edipuglia.
Cartault, A. (1905). Notes critiques sur Lucrèce. Revue de Philologie, 29, 33–35.
Cocatre-Zilgien, P. (2012). Lucrèce (De rerum natura 5. 1136–1160) et le progrès du droit. In E. Chevreau, D. Kremer, & A. Laquerrière-Lacroix (Eds.), Carmina Iuris. Mélanges en l'honneur de Michel Humbert (pp. 101–158). Paris: De Boccard.
Cole, T. (1967). Democritus and the Sources of Greek Anthropology. Chapel Hill, NC: American Philological Association.
De Vaan, M. (2008). Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages. Leiden – Boston: Brill.
Deufert, M. (1996). Pseudo-Lukrezisches im Lukrez: Die unechten Verse in Lukrezens De rerum natura. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Dodds, E. R. (1951). The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dodds, E. R. (1973). The Ancient Concept of Progress and Other Essays on Greek Literature and Belief. Oxford: University Press.
Dorandi, T. (1982). Filodemo. Il buon re secondo Omero (ed. T. Dorandi). Napoli: Bibliopolis.
Dyck, A. (1996). A Commentary on Cicero: De Officiis.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Edelstein, L. (1967). The Idea of Progress in Classical Antiquity. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Ernout, A., & Meillet, A. (2001). Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine: Histoire des mots (4. ed.). Paris: Klincksieck.
Farrell, J. (1994). //The Structure of Lucretius' "Anthropology". Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici, 33, 81–95.
Farrington, B. (1939). Science and Politics in the Ancient World. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Fish, J. (2002). Philodemus' on the Good King according to Homer: Columns 21–31. Cronache Ercolanesi, 32, 187–232.
Fish, J. (2011). Not all politicians are Sisyphus: What Roman Epicureans were taught about politics. In J. Fish, & K. R. Sanders (Eds.), Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition (pp. 72–104). Cambridge: University Press.
Fowler, D. P. (1989, 2007). Lucretius and Politics. In J. Barnes, & M. Griffin (Eds.), Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society (pp. 120–150). Oxford: University Press. (2. ed. 2007. In M. R. Gale (Ed.), Oxford Readings in Lucretius (pp. 397–431). Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Furley, D. (1966). Lucretius and the Stoics. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 13, 13–33. | DOI 10.1111/j.2041-5370.1966.tb00027.x
Furley, D. (1978). Lucretius the Epicurean: On the History of Man. In O. Gigon (ed.), Lucrèce: huit exposés suivis de discussions. Vandoeuvres-Genève, 22–27 août 1977 (Entretiens sur l'antiquité classique, 24; pp. 1-27). Genève: Entretiens sur l'Antiquité classique de la Fondation Hardt.
Gale, M. (1994). Myth and Poetry in Lucretius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gigante, M. (1987). La bibliothèque de Philodème et l'épicureisme romain. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Held, K. (2007). Hedone und Ataraxia bei Epikur. Paderborn: Mentis.
Hofmann, J. B., & Szantyr, A. (1965). Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik: mit dem allgemeinen Teil der lateinischen Grammatik (Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft, II, 2, 2). München: Beck.
Holmes, B. (2013). The Poetic Logic of Negative Exceptionalism in Lucretius, Book Five. In D. Lehoux, A.D. Morrison, A. Scharrock (Eds.), Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science (pp. 153-191). Oxford: University Press.
Horsfall, N. (2013). Virgil, Aeneid 6. Volume 2: Commentary and Appendices. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter.
Hutchinson, G. O. (2001). The Date of De rerum natura. Classical Quarterly, 51 (1), 150–162. | DOI 10.1093/cq/51.1.150
Kenney, E. J. (Ed.). (2014). Lucretius: De rerum natura. Book III (2. ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kleve, K. (1978). The Philosophical Polemics in Lucretius. A Study in the History of Epicurean Criticism. In O. Gigon (Ed.), Lucrèce: huit exposés suivis de discussions. Vandoeuvres-Genève, 22–27 août 1977 (Entretiens sur l'antiquité classique, 24; pp. 39–75). Genève: Entretiens sur l'Antiquité classique de la Fondation Hardt.
Leumann, M. (1977). Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre. In M. Leumann, J. B. Hofmann, & A. Szantyr (Eds.), Lateinische Grammatik (Vol. I). München: C. H. Beck.
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1971). The Justice of Zeus. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lovejoy, A. O., & Boas, G. (1935). Primitivism and Related Ideas in Antiquity. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Lyne, R.O.A.M. (1994), Subversion and intertextuality: Catullus 66. 39-40 and other examples. Greece & Rome. 41, 187-203. | DOI 10.1017/S0017383500023408
Markovic, D. (2008). The Rhetoric of Explanation in Lucretius' De rerum natura. Leiden – Boston: Brill.
McConnell, S. (2010). Epicureans on kingship. Cambridge Classical Journal, 56, 178–198. | DOI 10.1017/S1750270500000312
McConnell, S. (2012). Lucretius and civil strife. Phoenix, 66, 97–121. | DOI 10.7834/phoenix.66.1-2.0097
Merlan, P. H. (1950). Lucretius, Primitivist or Progressivist? Journal of the History of Ideas, 11, 364–368. | DOI 10.2307/2707737
Minyard, J. D. (1985). Lucretius and the Late Republic: An Essay in Roman Intellectual History. Leiden: Brill.
Mitsis, P. (1988). Epicurus' Ethical Theory. The Pleasures of Invulnerability. Ithaca – London: Cornell University Press.
Momigliano, A. (1941). Review of Science and Politics in the Ancient World by Benjamin Farrington (London 1939). Journal of Roman Studies, 31, 149–57.
Nichols, J. H. (1976). Epicurean Political Philosophy: The De Rerum Natura of Lucretius. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
O'Hara, J. (2007). Inconsistency in Roman Epic: Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan. Cambridge: University Press.
Penwill, J. L. (2009). Lucretius and the First Triumvirate. In W. J. Dominik, J. Garthwaite, & P. A. Roche (Eds.), Writing Politics in Imperial Rome (pp. 63–87). Leiden – Boston: Brill.
Reinhardt, K. (1921). Posidonios. München: C. H. Beck.
Reinhardt, T. (2004). Readers in the Underworld: Lucretius, De Rerum Natura 3.912 – 1075. Journal of Roman Studies, 94, 27–46.
Sasso, G. (1979). Il progresso e la morte: saggi su Lucrezio. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Saunders, T. J. (2001). Dicaearchus' Historical Anthropology. In W. W. Fortenbaugh, & E. Schütrumpf (Eds.), Dicaearchus of Messana. Text, Translation, and Discussion (pp. 237–254). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities.
Schiesaro, A. (2007). Lucretius and Roman Politics and History. In P. R. Hardie, & S. Gillespie (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius (pp. 41–58). Cambridge: University Press.
Schrijvers, P. H. (1970). Horror ac divina voluptas: études sur la poétique et la poésie de Lucrèce. Amsterdam: A. M. Hakkert.
Sedley, D. (1998). Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge: University Press.
Segal, C. P. (1990). Lucretius on Death and Anxiety: Poetry and Philosophy in De rerum natura. Princeton: University Press.
Solaro, G. (2004). Lucrezio abiura Epicuro: Voltaire e il dialogo "Lucrèce et Posidonius". Quaderni di Storia, 59, 157–165.
Spoerri, W. (1959). Späthellenistische Berichte über Welt, Kultur und Götter. Untersuchungen zu Diodor von Sizilien. Basel: Reinhardt.
Taylor, M. (1947). Progress and Primitivism in Lucretius. American Journal of Philology, 68, 180–197. | DOI 10.2307/290952
Warren, J. (2002). Epicurus and Democritean Ethics: An Archeology of Ataraxia. Cambridge: University Press.
Warren, J. (2007). Lucretius and Greek Philosophy. In P. Hardie, & S. Gillespie (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius (pp. 19–32). Cambridge: University Press.
Wolfdorf, D. (2013). Epicurus and the Cyrenaics on Katastematic and Kinetic Pleasures. In D. Wolfdorf (Ed.), Pleasure in Ancient Greek Philosophy (pp. 144–181). Cambridge: University Press.
Zago, G. (2012). Sapienza filosofica e cultura materiale. Posidonio e le altre fonti dell'Epistola 90 di Seneca. Bologna: Il Mulino.
