Anatomical adjectives with the components -ideus and -formis

Vol.17,No.2(2012)

František Šimon Elena Marečková-Štolcová

Stable URL (handle):
http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/126029

PDF
Abstract
This contribution presents some observations on the expression of formal similarity in anatomical nomenclature using composite adjectives with the specific feature of the suffixes –eides, es (in the latinized version –ideus, a, um) and –formis, e. Using selected, terminologically interesting documents, the significant changes and modifications are pointed out, which the terms in this distinct and homogeneous group have undergone in the course of their development from ancient times to the present. Whereas the majority of adjectives with the suffix –ideus, which predominate in the terminological sets, have their origin in ancient Greek, the Latin component –formis started being used in the terminology in the modern age, and its productivity is much lower.

Keywords:
terminology of anatomy; history; adjectives; expressing of shape

Pages:
205–213
References

Barcia Goyanes, Juan José. 1978–1993. Onomatología anatómica nova: historia del lenguaje anatómico. I–X. Valencia.

Bartholin, Thomas. 1651. Anatomia. Lugduni Batavorum (Leiden).

Bartholin, Thomas. 1684. Anatomia quartum renovata. Lugduni (Leiden).

Bauhin, Caspar. 1605. Theatrum Anatomicum. Francofurti at Moenum (Frankfurt am Main).

Blaes (Blasius), Gerard. 1666. Anatome medullae spinalis, et nervorum inde provenientium. Amstelodami (Amsterdam).

Burnet, John [Ed.]. 1979 – 1984. Platonis opera. I–V. Oxford.

Castellus, Bartholomaeus. 1682. Lexicon medicum. Norimbergae (Nürnberg).

Colombo, Matteo Realdo. 1559. De re anatomica libri XV. Venetiis (Venezia).

Daremberg, Charles – Ruelle, Emile (Eds.). 1879. Oeuvres de Rufus d'Ephèse. Paris. Reprint: 1963. Amsterdam.

Dittmeyer, Leonardus [Ed.]. 1907. Aristotelis de animalibus historia. Leipzig.

Du Laurens, André. 1600. Historia anatomica humani corporis et singularium ejus partium multis controversiis et observationibus novis illustrata. Parisiis (Paris).

Dvořák, J. 1960. Srovnávací slovník anatomických nomenklatur. Praha.

Einarson, Benedict – Link, Georg K. K. [Eds., Transl.]. 1976. Theophrastus: De causis plantarum. Vol. I: Books 1–2. London – Cambridge.

Eustachi (Eustachius), Bartholomeo. 1728. Tabulae anatomicae. Rome (Roma).

Ilberg, Johannes [Ed.]. 1927. Sorani Gynaeciorum libri IV, De signis fracturarum, De fasciis, Vita Hippocratis sec. Soranum. (CMG IV). Leipzig – Berlin.

Falloppio, Gabriele. 1562. Observationes anatomicae. Parisiis (Paris).

Hyrtl, Joseph. 1880. Onomatologia anatomica. Wien.

Kühn, Carl Gottlob [Ed., Übers.]. 1821–1833. Claudii Galeni opera omnia. I–XX. Leipzig.

Liddel, George Henry – Scott, Robert. 1996. Greek-English Lexikon. 9. ed. Oxford.

Littré, Émile [Ed., Trad. ]. 1839–1861. Oeuvres complètes d'Hippocrate. I–X. Paris.

Marx, Friedrich [Ed.]. 1915. Cornelii Celsi quae supersunt. (De medicina.). (CML I.). Leipzig – Berlin.

Riolan, Jean (fils). 1618. Anthropographia et osteologia. Parisiis (Paris).

Shackleton Bailey, David Roy [Ed.]. 1985. Q. Horati Flacci opera. Stuttgart.

Stallbaum, Johann Gottfried. [Ed.]. 1825–1826. Eustathii archiepiscopi Thessalonicensis commentarii ad Homeri Iliadem et Odysseam. 2 vols. Leipzig.

Töply, Robert. [Übers.]. 1904. " Anatomische Werke des Rhuphos und Galenos." In: Anatomische Hefte. Abteilung 1, Band 25, Heft 2, [2], 345–472.

Winslow, Jacques-Benigne. 1732. Exposition anatomique de la structure du corps humain. Paris.

Metrics

24

Views

0

PDF views

PDF