Herodotean oracles: moral and rational responses to ambiguity

Vol.20,No.2(2015)

Krista Rodkey

Stable URL (handle):
http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/134637

PDF
Abstract
The oracles that appear in Herodotus's Histories are usually ambiguous, yet despite this ambiguity it is clear from his narratives that Herodotus holds oracle-recipients morally responsible for their oracular interpretations, whether correct or incorrect. Though these two commitments seem to be in tension, I challenge the traditional view that Herodotus' responsibility standard is too high given the ambiguity of the oracles. Instead of examining the ambiguity of the oracular texts in isolation, I argue the texts must be considered in an interpretive situation involving four sources of uncertainty: the genuineness of the oracle, the disposition of the god consulted, the oracular text itself, and the appropriate response to it. Facing these ambiguities, I argue, Herodotus's characters can take one of two coherent attitudes toward the oracle decision-making process: the attitude of the powerful and controlling who hope to overcome the uncertainty surrounding oracles by making use of their cleverness and power, or the attitude of the pious who hope to understand the oracles from within a framework of piety, good sense, and community integrity.

Keywords:
Herodotus; oracles; riddles; fate; character; humility; hubris

Pages:
161–176
References

Fontenrose, J. (1978). The Delphic Oracle: Its Responses and Operations. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Georges, P. B. (1986). Saving Herodotus' Phenomena: The Oracles and the Events of 480 B.C. Classical Antiquity, 5(1), 14–59. | DOI 10.2307/25010838

Harrison, T. (2000). Divinity and History: The Religion of Herodotus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kindt, J. (2006). Delphic Oracle Stories and the Beginning of Historiography: Herodotus' Croesus Logos. Classical Philology, 101, 34–51. | DOI 10.1086/505670

Lateiner, D. (2007). Oracles, Religion, and Politics in Herodotus. In R. B. Strassler (Ed.), The Landmark Herodotus: the histories (pp. 810–815). New York: Pantheon.

Marinatos, N. (1981). Thucydides and Oracles. The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 101, 138– 140. | DOI 10.2307/629854

Maurizio, L. (1997). Delphic Oracles as Oral Performances: Authenticity and Historical Evidence. Classical Antiquity, 16(2), 308–334. | DOI 10.2307/25011067

Ovid (1986). Metamorphoses. (Trans. A. D. Melville.) Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Parke, H. W., & Wormell, D. E. W. (1956). The Delphic Oracle (I. and II.). Oxford: Blackwell.

Pelling, C. (2006). Educating Croesus: Talking and Learning in Herodotus' Lydian. Classical Antiquity, 25(1), 141–177. | DOI 10.1525/ca.2006.25.1.141

Shapiro, S. (1996). Herodotus and Solon. Classical Antiquity, 15(2), 348–364. | DOI 10.2307/25011045

Sayers, D. (1963). Oedipus Simplex: Freedom and Fate in Folklore and Fiction. In Ead., The Poetry of Search and the Poetry of Statement (pp. 243–261). London: Gollancz.

Walsh, L. (2003). The Rhetoric of Oracles. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 33(3), 55–78. | DOI 10.1080/02773940309391259

Zagzebski, L., & Fairweather, A. (2003). Virtue Epistemology and Responsibility. Mind, 112(445), 178–181. | DOI 10.1093/mind/112.445.178

Zagzebski, L., & Depaul, M. (2004). Intellectual Virtue. Mind, 113(452), 791–794. | DOI 10.1093/mind/113.452.791

Metrics

14

Views

0

PDF views

PDF