Pritčevaja specifika kinopovesti "Rodnik dlja žažduščich" I. Drača

Roč.14,č.2(2021)

Natal'ja Valeryanovna Nykorjak

https://doi.org/10.5817/NR2021-2-2

Trvalý odkaz (handle):
http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/144514

PDF (ruština)
Abstrakt
The film story Spring for the Thirsty by I. Drach is a text that is close in its parameters to the peculiarities of parable poetics. Direct instruction and unambiguous didacticism, which is characteristic of the parable genre, are strengthened by philosophical reflection (from prologue to epilogue). The image of the main character is depicted, above all, through the psychological motivation of his actions, with some features of certain idealization of the image in a dichotomous tandem "fathers and children". In the aspect of parable specifics, particular emphasis is laid on the tendency towards generalization, as well as on a peculiar (marked with a high extent of conventionality) principle of abstraction of ideas. The author actively reproduces dreams or visions (metaphorical, symbolic), which are closely related to the main events of the text. With the help of this technique, he conveys the inner experiences, subconsciousness, fears or hopes of the old Levko, at the same time erasing the boundaries between reality and unreality. The application of such a two-dimensionality in the narrative of the text, strengthened by the active use of intertextual and intermediate codes, offers a deep philosophical implication inherent in the parable.

Klíčová slova:
film story; film parable; intertext; intermedial code; Spring for the Thirsty; I. Drach

Stránky:
15–30
Reference

BRJUCHOVEC'KA, L. (2006): Kìnosvìt Jurìja Ìlljenka. Kyjiv.

BRJUCHOVEC'KA, L. (2016): Na polì kìnematohrafìčnomu. Scenarìji Ìvana Drača. Kyjiv.

BRJUCHOVEC'KA, L. Ì. (1989): Poetyčna chvylja ukrajins'koho kìno. Kyjiv.

ČERVÌNS'KA, O. V. (2015): Arhumenty formy: monohrafìja. Černìvcì.

DRAČ, Ì. (1964): Krynycja dlja sprahlych. Dnìpro, 1964, № 10, s. 7–42.

DRAČ, Ì. (2010): Krynycja dlja sprahlych. In: DRAČ, Ì.: Tvory: u 3 t. T. 2. Kìnopovìstì. Kyjiv, s. 10–66.

FATEJEVA, N. A. (2007): Intertekst v mire tekstov: Kontrapunkt intertekstual'nost'. Moskva.

FATEJEVA, N. (2010): Sintez celogo: Na puti k novoj poètike. Moskva.

KLYM'JUK, Ju. Ì. (1996): Prytčevìst' jak zasìb chudožn'oho zobražennja. In: ČERVÌNS'KA, O. V. (red.): Pytannja lìteraturoznavstva: naukovyj zbìrnyk. Vyp. 3 (60). Černìvcì, s. 132–141.

KOZUL'KO, A. (2015): Smert' Sokrata. In: ŽULYNS'KYJ, M. H. (hol. red.): Ševčenkìvs'ka encyklopedìja: u 6 t. T. 5. Kyjiv, s. 862–863.

KOPYSTJANS'KA, N. Ch. (2005): Žanr, žanrova systema u prostorì lìteraturoznavstva. L'vìv.

Krynycja dlja sprahlych (1965), rež. Ju. Ìllenko.

MANEVIČ, I. M. (1966): Kino i literatura. Moskva.

P'EGE-GRO, N. (2008): Vvedenije v teoriju intertekstual 'nosti. Moskva.

PLATON (1990): Apologija Sokrata. In: Sobranije soč.: v 4 t. T. 1. Moskva, s. 70–96.

POTAPENKO, O. (2015): Krynycja. In: Encyklopedyčnyj slovnyk symvolìv kul'tury Ukrajiny. Za zah. red. Kocura, V. P., Potapenka, O. Ì., Kujbìdy, V. V. Korsun'-Ševčenkìvs'kyj. Kyjiv, s. 412–413.

TKAČENKO, A. (2016): Kìnodramaturhìja Ìvana Drača. Slovo ì Čas, 2016, № 12, s. 91–96.

TRYMBAČ, S. (2011): Ìvan Drač jak kìnematohraf. In: Ìvan Drač. Lìteratura. Kìnematohraf. Polìtyka: bìobìblìohr. pokažč. Kyjiv, s. 33–41.

TUGUŠI, S. A. (2008): Kinopritča kak žanr kinematografa. Vestnik MGU kul'tury i iskusstv, 2008, № 2, s. 259–263.

TUGUŠI, S. A. (2011): Pritča v samosoznanii masterov mirovogo kino. Vesnik VGIK, 2011, № 8, s. 86–98.

Metriky

0

Crossref logo

15

Views

0

PDF (ruština) views

PDF (ruština)