Peer review

Archaeologia historica is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible measures against any publication malpractices. In submitting their works to the journal for consideration for publication all authors are thereby confirming that the works represent their own original contributions and have not been copied or plagiarised in whole or in part from other works. Each paper submitted to the editorial office is subsequently sent to two reviewers. The peer review procedure is double-blind and consists of two parts: a personalised assessment intended for the editorial office (regarding the authenticity and quality of the paper) and anonymous comments addressed to the author of the paper (evaluated are the argumentative structure of the paper, its linguistic aspect, accuracy of the abstract and key words, bibliography, the quality and relevance of pictorial documentation a. o.). The author is asked to revise his/her manuscript in response to the suggestions of the peer reviewers. If the reviewers do not recommend to accept the paper, it is rejected from further evaluation. See review form (.doc)