Attitude markers in L2 learners' academic writing : a case study of master's theses by Czech students compared to L1 students' writings
Vol.49,No.1(2023)
metadiscourse; writer-reader interaction; interactional metadiscourse; attitude markers; academic writing; Master's theses
5–31
Abdollahzadeh, Esmaeel (2011) Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 288–297. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.019 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.019</a>
Ädel, Annelie (2006) Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Biber, Douglas (2006) Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5, 97–116. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001</a>
Bunton, David (1999) The use of higher level metatext in PhD theses. English for Specific Purposes 18, 41–56. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00022-2 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00022-2</a>
Connor, Ula (2004) Intercultural rhetoric research: beyond texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 3, 291–304. <a href=https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.132039 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.132039</a>
Crismore, Avon, Markkanen, Raija and Steffensen, Margaret S. (1993) Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: a study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication 10 (1), 39–71. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002</a>
Crosthwaite, Peter and Jiang, Kevin (2017) Does EAP affect written L2 academic stance? A longitudinal learner corpus study. System 69, 92–107. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.06.010 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.06.010</a>
Crosthwaite, Peter, Cheung, Lisa and Jiang, Feng K. (2017) Writing with attitude: Stance expressions in learner and professional dentistry research reports. English for Specific Purposes 46, 107–123. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.02.001 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.02.001</a>
Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga (2016) Cross-cultural variation in the use of hedges and boosters in academic discourse. Prague Journal of English Studies 5 (1), 163–184. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pjes-2016-0009 target=_blank>http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pjes-2016-0009</a>
Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga (2021) Engaging with the reader in research articles in English: Variation across disciplines and linguacultural backgrounds. English for Specific Purposes 63, 18–32. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.02.003 target=_blank>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.02.003</a>
Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga, Jančaříková, Renata, Hůlková, Irena and Schmied, Josef (2020) Theme choices in Czech university students' English-medium master's theses. Lingua 243, August 2020, 102892. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102892 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102892</a>
Gholami, Javad, Nejad, Sara Rafsanjani and Pour, Jahanbakhsh Looragi (2014) Metadiscourse markers misuses: A study of EFL learners' argumentative essays. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 98, 580–598. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.454 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.454</a>
Gilaerts, Paul and Van de Velde, Freek (2010) Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9, 128–139. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.004 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.004</a>
Guziurová, Tereza (2020) Discourse reflexivity in written academic English as lingua franca: Code glosses in research articles. Discourse and Interaction 13 (2), 36–54. <a href=https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2020-2-36 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2020-2-36</a>
Harris, Zellig S. (1959) The transformational model of language structure. Anthropological Linguistics 1 (1), 27–29.
Heuboeck, Alois, Holmes, Jasper and Nesi, Hilary (2008) The BAWE Corpus Manual. Accessed on 2 November, 2022. <a href=https://www.reading.ac.uk/internal/appling/bawe/BAWE.documentation.pdf target=_blank>https://www.reading.ac.uk/internal/appling/bawe/BAWE.documentation.pdf</a>
Ho, Victor and Li, Cissy (2018) The use of metadiscourse and persuasion: An analysis of first year university students' timed argumentative essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 33, 53–68. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.02.001 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.02.001</a>
Hu, Guangwei and Cao, Feng (2015) Disciplinary and paradigmatic influences on interactional metadiscourse in research articles. English for Specific Purposes 39, 12–25. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.03.002 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.03.002</a>
Hyland, Ken (1998) Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics 30, 437–455. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5</a>
Hyland, Ken (2001) Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles. Written Communication 18 (4), 549-574. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018004005 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018004005</a>
Hyland, Ken (2004a) Disciplinary Discourses. Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, Ken (2004b) Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 13, 133–151. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001</a>
Hyland, Ken (2005) Metadiscourse. Exploring Interaction in Writing. London and New York: Continuum.
Hyland, Ken (2008) Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies 8 (2), 1–23.
Hyland, Ken (2017) Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics 113, 16–29. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007</a>
Hyland, Ken and Jiang, Feng K. (2016) "We must conclude that…": A diachronic study of academic engagement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 24, 29–42. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.09.003 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.09.003</a>
Hyland, Ken and Jiang, Feng K. (2017) "We believe that …': Changes in an academic stance marker. Australian Journal of Linguistics, published online in December 2017, 139–161. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2018.1400498 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2018.1400498</a>
Hyland, Ken and Jiang, Feng K. (2018) "In this paper we suggest": Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. English for Specific Purposes 51, 18–30. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001</a>
Hyland, Ken and Tse, Polly (2004) Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal. Applied Linguistics 25 (2), 156–177. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156</a>
Kilgarriff, Adam, Rychly, Pavel, Smrz, Pavel and Tugwell, David (2004) The Sketch engine. Proc Eleventh EURALEX International Congress. France: Lorient.
Koutsantoni, Dimitra (2004) Attitude, certainty and allusions to common knowledge in scientific research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 3, 163–182. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2003.08.001 target=_blank>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2003.08.001</a>
Lancaster, Zak (2016) Expressing stance in undergraduate writing: Discipline-specific and general qualities. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 23, 16–30. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.006 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.006</a>
Mauranen, Anna (1993) Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes 12, 3-22. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(93)90024-I target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(93)90024-I</a>
Mu, Congjun, Zhang, Lawrence Jun, Ehrich, John and Hong, Huaqing (2015) The use of metadiscourse for knowledge construction in Chinese and English research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 20, 135–148. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.09.003 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.09.003</a>
Mur-Dueñas, Pilar (2007) 'I/we focus on…': A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6, 143–162. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.05.002 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.05.002</a>
Mur-Dueñas, Pilar (2010) Attitude markers in business management research articles: A cross-cultural corpus-driven approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 20 (1), 50–72. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00228.x target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00228.x</a>
Mur-Dueñas, Pilar (2011) An intercultural analysis of metadiscourse features in research articles written in English and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 3068–3079. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.002 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.002</a>
Povolná, Renata (2013) On some variation in the use of discourse markers by Czech and German students of English. Discourse and Interaction 6 (2), 41–60. <a href=https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2013-2-41 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2013-2-41</a>
Quirk, Randolph and Greenbaum, Sidney (1990) A Student's Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.
Rayson, Paul, Berridge, Damon and Francis, Brian (2004) Extending the Cochran rule for the comparison of word frequencies between corpora. In: Purnelle, C., Fairon, C. and Dister, A. (Eds) Le poids des mots: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Statistical Analysis of Textual Data (JADT 2004). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain, 926–936.
Stotesbury, Hilkka (2003) Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2, 327–341. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00049-3 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00049-3</a>
Thetela, Puleng (1997) Evaluated entities and parameters of value in academic research articles. English for Specific Purposes 16 (2), 101–118. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00022-1 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00022-1</a>
Thompson, Geoff (2001) Interaction in Academic Writing: Learning to Argue with the Reader. Applied Linguistics 22 (1), 58–78. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.58 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.58</a>
Thompson, Geoff and Thetela, Puleng (1995) The sound of one hand clapping: The management of interaction in written discourse. Text 15 (1), 103–127. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1995.15.1.103 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1995.15.1.103</a>
Vande Kopple, William J. (1985) Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College composition and communication 36, 82–93. <a href=https://doi.org/10.2307/357609 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.2307/357609</a>
Wei, Jing, Li, Yan, Zhou, Ting and Gong, Zhiwei (2016) Studies on metadiscourse since the 3rd millennium. Journal of Education and Practice 7 (9), 194–204.
Williams, Joseph M. (1981) Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace. Northbrook, Illinois: Scott, Forsman and Company.
Yoon, Hyung-Jo and Römer, Ute (2020) Quantifying disciplinary voices: An automated approach to interactional metadiscourse in successful student writing. Written Communication 37 (2), 208–244. <a href=https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319898672 target=_blank>https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319898672</a>

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.