Normativity and transgression in the paradigmatic distribution of verbal romance suppletion

Vol.39,No.1(2018)

Abstract
The apparently irregular structure of verbal suppletive paradigms in Romance languages reveals in fact a well-established logic in the speakers' language behaviour that has been preserved with uniformity over time and space. Since the introduction of the concept of "morphome" (Aronoff 1994), it has been possible to assess these so-called anomalies as a central phenomenon both in the natural diachronic evolution and in the continuous reorganization of verbal paradigms realized by the speakers. Nevertheless, one of the main difficulties of such a perspective when applied to Romance languages stands in the impossibility of making absolute abstractions of general principles that are at the base of these distributions in verbal paradigms. However, it is possible to deal appropriately with this kind of problems, albeit not definitely solve them, if the research into this issue refers to theories, past and present, about the concept of "linguistic norm", where Romance verbal morphomes can be described as an expression of the freedom in a language system.

Keywords:
suppletion; ŕomance verb; morpheme; verbal paradigm; linguistic norm

Pages:
79–93
References

Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself: stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Aski, J. M. (1995). Verbal suppletion: an analysis of Italian, French and Spanish 'to go'. Linguistics, 33, 403–432.

Bartsch, R. (1982). The concepts of «rule» and «norm» in linguistics. Lingua, 58, 51–81. | DOI 10.1016/0024-3841(82)90057-2

Bhat, D. N. S. (1967). Lexical suppletion in baby talk. Anthropological Linguistics, 9 (5), 33–36.

Börjars K.; & Vincent, N. (2011). The pre-conditions for suppletion. In G. Tsoulas, A. Galani, & G. Hicks (Eds.), Morphology and its Interfaces (pp. 239–265). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. | DOI 10.1075/tsl.9

Corbett, G. G. et al. (2005). Resources for Suppletion: A Typological Database and a Bibliography, Morphology and Linguistic Typology. In G. Booij, E. Guevara, A. Ralli, S. Sgroi, & S. Scalise (Eds.), On-line Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4) Catania, 21–23 September 2003 Università degli Studi di Bologna (pp. 35–44). < https://geertbooij.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/mmm4- proceedings.pdf>

Corbett, G. G. (2007). Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language, 83 (1), 9–42. | DOI 10.1353/lan.2007.0006

Dressler, W. (1985). Sur le statut de la suppléance dans la Morphologie Naturelle. Langages, 20 (78), 41–56. | DOI 10.3406/lgge.1985.2463

Fertig, D. (1998). Suppletion, natural morphology, diagrammaticity. Linguistics, 36 (6), 1065–1091. | DOI 10.1515/ling.1998.36.6.1065

Giraudo, H.; Montermini, F.; & Pirrelli, V. (2010). Processi cognitivi nell'analisi delle classi verbali dell'italiano: un approccio sperimentale. In V. Bambini, I. Ricci, & P. M. Bertinetto (Eds.), Linguaggio e cervello – Semantica. Atti del XLII Convegno della Società di Linguistica Italiana (Pisa, Scuola Normale Superiore, 25–27 settembre 2008). Roma: Bulzoni. < https://hal-univ-tlse2.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00986159/document>

Hinzelin, M.-O. (2011). Syncretism and Suppletion in Gallo-Romanc Verb Paradigms. In M. Maiden et al. (Eds.), Morphological autonomy. Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology. (pp. 287–310). New York: Oxford University Press.

Hippisley, A. et al. (2004). Suppletion: frequency, categories and distribution of stems. Studies in Language, 28 (2), 387–418. | DOI 10.1075/sl.28.2.05hip

Itkonen, E. (2008). The central role of normativity in language and linguistics. In J. Zlatev (Ed.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity (pp. 279–305). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Juge, M. (2013). Analogy as a source for suppletion. In R. Kikusava, & L. A. Reid (Eds.), Historical Linguistics 2011. Selected papers from the 20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Osaka, 25 – 30 July 2011. (pp. 175–197). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Ledgeway, A.; & Maiden, M. (Eds.) (2016). The Oxford guide to the romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Luís, A. R.; & Bermúdez-Otero, R. (eds.). (2016). The morphome debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Maiden, M. (2001). Di nuovo sulle alternanze 'velari' nel verbo italiano e spagnolo. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana, 8, 39–61.

Maiden, M. (2004a). Verso una definizione morfologica delle lingue romanze. La nuova fisionomia morfologica del romanzo. Aemilianense, I, 357–404.

Maiden, M. (2004b). When lexemes become allomorphs – On the genesis of suppletion. Folia linguistica, 38, 227–256.

Maiden, M. (2007). La linguistica romanza alla ricerca dell'arbitrario. In D. Trotter (Ed.), Actes du XXIVe Congrès International de Linguistique et Philologie Romane, Aberystwyth, 2004 (vol. III) (pp. 506–518). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.

Maiden, M. (2009). From pure phonology to pure morphology the reshaping of the romance verb. In M. Russo (Ed.), Pour une typologie diachronique et synchronique des langues romanes. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes (pp. 45–82). < http://rlv.revues.org/1765>

Maiden, M. (2011). Morphophonological innovation. In M. Maiden, J. Ch. Smith, & A. Ledgeway (Eds.), The Cambridge history of the romance languages (Vol. 1–structures) (pp. 216–267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Maiden, M. (2016). Morphome. In A. Ledgeway, & M. Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the romance languages (pp. 708–721). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Meľčuk, I. A. (1994). Suppletion: Toward a logical analysis of the concept. Studies in Language, 18 (2), 339–410. | DOI 10.1075/sl.18.2.03mel

Myhill, J. (2001). Suppletion, lexical meaning, semantic primitives, and translation data. Linguistics, 39, 761–802. | DOI 10.1515/ling.2001.031

Nebeská, I. (1996). Jazyk, norma, spisovnost. Praha: Univerzita Karlova.

Nevins, A.; & Rodrigues, C. (2012). Naturalness biases, 'morphomes', and the Romance first person singular. Paper presented at University of Coimbra, Newcastle University, University of York, and University Paris VII. < http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001469>

Nevins, A.; Rodrigues, C.; & Tang, K. (2015). The rise and fall of the L-shaped morphome: diachronic and experimental studies. Probus, 27 (1), 101–155. | DOI 10.1515/probus-2015-0002

O'Neill, P. (2011). The Notion of the Morphom. In M. Maiden, et al. (Eds.), Morphological autonomy. Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology (pp. 70–93). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Osthoff, H. (1899). Vom Suppletivwesen der indogermanischen Sprachen. Heidelberg: Kommissionsverlag von Alfred Wolff.

Rastier, F. (2008). Conditions d'une linguistique des normes. In A. Steuckardt, & G. Siouffi (Eds.), Les linguistes et la norme – Aspects normatifs du discours linguistique, (pp. 3–20). Berne: Peter Lang.

Rudes, B. A. (1980). On the nature of verbal suppletion. Linguistics, 18, 655–676. | DOI 10.1515/ling.1980.18.7-8.655

Smith, J. Ch. (2011). Change and continuity in form – function relationships. In M. Maiden, J. Ch. Smith, & A. Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the romance languages (Vol. 1–Structures) (pp. 268–317). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Veselinova, L. N. (2006). Suppletion in Verb Paradigms: Bits and Pieces of the Puzzle. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Metrics

0

Crossref logo

0

web of science logo


12

Views

0

PDF (Italiano) views