Paralessi orizzontale e verticale come strumento metalettico di attivazione del legame fantastico : tipologie e studio di casi in racconti di Michele Mari

Paolo Remorini

doi:10.5817/ERB2023-2-17

Paralessi orizzontale e verticale come strumento metalettico di attivazione del legame fantastico : tipologie e studio di casi in racconti di Michele Mari

Roč.44,č.2(2023)

Paolo Remorini

https://doi.org/10.5817/ERB2023-2-17

Trvalý odkaz (handle):
http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/digilib.78722

PDF (italština)

Abstrakt

We propose in this article an updated definition of paralepsis as a metaleptic tool as unexpected information that concerns not only an anomaly of focalization of fictional discourse (Genette 1972) but an ontological transgression of narrative levels, demarcating the scope of two potential categories, both with two subtypes (vertical top-down and bottom-up paralepsis; horizontal internal and external paralepsis). We seek in this way to move beyond Genette's primordial definition and the meager studies of subsequent decades in light of the work of cognitive narratology on the hermeneutic processes operative in narrative experience and of fantastic linkages in apperception theory (Remorini 2023). We also apply the implications of these definitions to the analysis of Michele Mari's short stories "Josef K." and "Lamento del guerriero" (featured in the 2002 short story collection Fantasmagonia).

Klíčová slova:
cognitive narratology; paralepsis; metalepsis; Michele Mari; apperception theory; fantastic

Stránky:
267–287

Reference

Alexander, M.; & Emmott, C. (2014). Schemata. In P. Hühn et al. (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University. http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/schemata

Carnevale, D. (2019). La 'parola fantastica': Logopoiesi, retoriche dell'indicibile e mostri verbali. In B. Aldinucci et al. (Eds.), Parola. una nozione unica per una ricerca multidisciplinare (pp. 65–73). Siena: Università per Stranieri di Siena.

Cohn, D. (2012). Metalepsis and Mise en Abyme. Narrative, 20, 1, 105–14. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2012.0003

Fludernik, M. (2003). Scene Shift, Metalepsis, and the Metaleptic Mode. Style, 37, 4, 382–400.

Fludernik, M. (2005). Histories of Narrative Theory (II): From Structuralism to the Present. In J. Phelan, P. J. Rabinowitz (Eds.), A Companion to Narrative Theory (pp. 36–59). Malden: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996935.ch3

Fludernik, M. (2009). An Introduction to Narratology. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203882887

Genette, G. (1972). Figure III. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Gil Guerrero, H. (2006). Lo fantástico como transgresión. postulación fantástica en los relatos borgianos. In N. Grabe et al. (Eds.), La narración paradójica. normas narrativas y el principio de la transgresión (pp. 183–92). Madrid: Vervuert Verlag. https://doi.org/10.31819/9783964561626–011

Gobyn, S. (2014). Textual Effects of Metalepsis. Amsterdam International Journal for Cultural Narratology, 7–8, 120–37.

Grishakova, M. (2009). Beyond the Frame: Cognitive Science, Common Sense and Fiction. Narrative, 17, 2, 188–99. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.0.0022

Grishakova, M. (2019). Necessary Fictions: Supernormal Cues, Complex Cognition, and the Nature of Fictional Narrative. In M. Grishakova, M. Poulaki (Eds.), Narrative Complexity. Cognition, Embodiment, Evolution (pp. 391–413). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Hanebeck, J. (2017). Understanding Metalepsis: The Hermeneutics of Narrative Transgression. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110516920

Herman, D. (2013). Cognitive Narratology. In P. Hühn et al. (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology, Hamburg: Hamburg University. https://www-archiv.fdm.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/node/38.html

Jahn, M. (1999). 'Speak, friend, and enter': Garden Paths, Artificial Intelligence, and Cognitive Narratology. In D. Herman (Eds.), Narratologies: New Perspectives on Narrative Analysis (pp. 167–194). Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.

Jahn, M. (2011). Response to Five Questions on Narrative Theories and Poetricsy. In P. F. Bundgaard et al. (Eds.), Five Questions: Narrative Theories and Poetics (pp. 88–95). New York: Automatic Press/VIP.

Jahn, M. (2021). Narratology 2.3: A Guide to the Theory of Narrative.

Kim, A. (2016). Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt. In E. N. Zalta (Eds.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University.

Lang, S. (2006). Prolegómenos para una teoría de la narración paradójica. In N. Grabe et al. (Eds.) La narración paradójica. normas narrativas y el principio de la transgresión (pp. 21–47). Madrid: Vervuert Verlag. https://doi.org/10.31819/9783964561626–002

Leibniz, G. W. (1714). Principes de la nature et de la grâce fondés en raison. https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Principes_de_la_nature_et_de_la_gr%C3%A2ce_fond%C3%A9s_en_raison [view date: 23 Sep 2022].

Leleń, H. (2014). The Fantastic as a Technique of Redynamizing Mimetic Fiction. In J. Matyjaszczyk et al. (Eds.), Basic Categories of Fantastic Literature Revisited (pp. 8–24), Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Malina, D. (2002). Breaking the Frame. Metalepsis and the Construction of the Subject. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

Mari, M. (2012). Fantasmagonia. Torino: Einaudi.

Mari, M. (2014). Roderick Duddle. Torino: Einaudi.

Martínez, J. M. (2008). Subversion or Oxymoron?: Fantastic Literature and the Metaphysics of the Object. Neophilologus, 92, 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061–007–9091–7

Meyer-Minnemann, K. (2006). Narración paradójica y ficción. In N. Grabe et al. (Eds.), La narración paradójica. normas narrativas y el principio de la transgresión (pp. 49–71). Madrid: Vervuert Verlag. https://doi.org/10.31819/9783964561626–003

Nelles, W. (1992). Stories within Stories Narrative Levels and Embedded Narrative. Studies in the Literary Imagination, 25, 79–96.

Niederhoff, B. (2013). Focalization. In P. Hühn et al. (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University. https://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/node/18.html

Prince, G. (2006). Disturbing Frames. Poetics Today, 27, 3, 625–30. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372–2006–005

Remorini, P. (2023). Aproximación cognitiva a lo fantástico como vínculo: la teoría de las apercepciones. Definición y aplicaciones en relatos de Julio Cortázar, Jorge Luis Borges y Ángel Olgoso. Brumal: Revista de Investigación sobre lo Fantástico, 10, 2, 15–45. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/brumal.903

Remorini, P. (2022). Il racconto innominato. Analisi del paratesto di Centuria. Cento piccoli romanzi fiume di Giorgio Manganelli. Forum Italicum, 56, 1, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/00145858221079216

Roas, D. (2011). Una realidad (aparentemente) estable y objetiva. tras los límites de lo real. una definición de lo fantástico. Madrid: Páginas de Espuma.

Ryan, M. L. (2004). Metaleptic Machines. Semiotica, 150, 439–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2004.055

Sandner, D. (2011). Critical Discourses of the Fantastic, 1712–1831. London: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315574974

Schneider, R. (2001). Toward a Cognitive Theory of Literary Character: The Dynamics of Mental-Model Construction. Style, 35, 4, 607–39.

Shen, D. (2005). What Narratology and Stylistics Can Do for Each Other. In J. Phelan, & P. J. Rabinowitz (Eds.), A Companion to Narrative Theory (pp. 136–149). London: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996935.ch9

Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive Poetics: an Introduction. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203995143

v. Möllendorff, P. (2018). Metalepsis. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.8231

Wicher, A. (2014). Introduction. In J. Matyjaszczyk et al. (Eds.), Basic Categories of Fantastic Literature Revisited (pp. 1–7). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Metriky