Informačná tvorivosť pri digitálnom akademickom písaní

ACRL (2016). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. In: American Library Association. 1996–2019. Association of College and Research Libraries. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework

Almatrafi, O. & Johri, A. (2025). Leveraging generative AI for course learning outcome categorization using Bloom´s taxonomy. In Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence (8) (2025), 100404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100404

Al-Omar, M. & Cox, A. (2013). Finders, Keepers, Losers, Seekers: A Study of Academics’ Research-Related Personal Information Collections. In: Yamamoto, S. (eds) Human Interface and the Management of Information. Information and Interaction Design. HIMI 2013. Lecture Notes in Comp. Science, vol 8016. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39209-2_20

Altmäe, S., Sola-Leyva, A., & Salumets, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a friend or a foe? in Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 47, (1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.04.009

Anderson, T. (2013). The 4Ps of Innovation Culture: Conceptions of Creatively Engaging with Information. In: Information Research. 18(3). https://InformationR.net/ir/18-3/colis/paperC28.html

Armstrong, P. (2010). Bloom´s taxonomy. Center for Teaching. Vanderbilt University. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Vanderbilt 2010.https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy/

Bawden, D. & L. Robinson (2022). Introduction to Information Science. Facet.

Bates, M. (2017). Information Behavior. In J.D: McDonald & M. Levine-Clark (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Library andInformation Sciences. 4^th ed., pp. 2074-2085. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1081/E-EISA-120053335

Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: myths and mechanisms. (2nd. ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Boden, M. A. (2018). Artificial intelligence: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

Bruce, Ch., Davis, K., Hughes, H., Partridge, H., & Stoodley, I. (Eds.). (2014). Information Experience: Approaches to Theory and Practice. Emerald.

Burchinal, L.G. (1976). The Communications Revolution: America´s Third Century Challenge. In The Future of Organizing Knowledge: Paper Presented at Texas A& M University Library Centennial Academic Assembly, Sept 24, 1976. Texas A&M University Library.

Cardona, M., Rodríguez, J.D., & K. Ishmael (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Future of Teaching and Learning: Insights and Recommendations. Washington, DC, (2023). U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. https://tech.ed.gov

Cattlin, J., & L.M. Given (2024). Information relations for social change: exploring the information behaviour of academics undertaking impact work. Information Research an international electronic journal, 29(2), 230-245.

Chan, C.K, Y. (2023). A Comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. In Int. J. Educ. Technol. Higher Educ. (2023) Vol. 20, No. 38, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3

Chiu, T. K., Ahmad, Z., Ismailov, M., & Sanusi, I. T. (2024). What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them. In Computers and Education Open, 6, 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100171

Ciriello, R. F.; Richter, A. & L. Mathiassen (2023). Emergence of creativity in IS development teams: a socio-technical systems perspective. In: International Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102698

Conrad, L.Y., Bruce, C.S. & Tucker, V.M. (2020). Constructing information experience: a grounded theory portrait of academic information management. In Aslib Journal of Information Management, Vol. 72 No. 4, pp. 653-670. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-11-2019-0333

Cox, A. (2024). Developing a library strategic response to Artificial Intelligence. In eLucidate, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.29173/elucidate847

Cox, A. (2023). How artificial intelligence might change academic library work: Applying the competencies, literature and the theory of the professions. In J. Assoc. Inf. Science and Technol., 74 (3), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24635

Cox, A., (2022). The Ethics of AI for Information Professionals: Eight Scenarios. In: Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association. Online. 71(3), s. 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2022.2084885

Cox, A. M. (2021). Exploring the impact of Artificial Intelligence and robots on higher education through literature-based design fictions. In International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18 (1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00237-8

Cox, A. M., Pinfield, S., & Rutter, S. (2019). The intelligent library: Thought leaders’ views on the likely impact of artificial intelligence on academic libraries. In Library Hi Tech, 37(3), 418-435. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-08-2018-0105

Cox, A.M. & Mazumdar, S. (2022). Defining artificial intelligence for librarians. In Journal of Librarianship andInformation Science, 2022, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221142029

Černý, M. (2023). Informační gramotnost. Praha: Grada 2023. 317 s.

Dahlquist, Mark (2023). Toward a Framework for Information Creativity. In College & Research Libraries, v. 84, n. 3, p. 441, May 2023. ISSN 2150-6701. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.84.3.441

Dali, K.; A. Lau &. K. Risk, (2015). Academically Informed Creative Writing in LIS Programs and the Freedom to be Creative. In J. Education for Library and Information Science. Online. 56(4), 298 – 324. https://doi:10.12783/issn.2328-2967/56/4/3

Davenport, T. H., (2018). The AI Advantage. How to Put the Artificial Intelligence Revolution to Work. MIT Press.

Dervin, B. (2005). What Methodology Does to Theory: Sense-Making Methodology as Exemplar. In K. E. Fisher, S. Erdelez, & L. McKechnie (Eds.), Theories of Information Behavior (pp. 25-30). Information Today.

Doshi, Anil R. & O. Hauser (2023). Generative artificial intelligence enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content. In: SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4535536

Ferrara, E. (2024). GenAI against humanity: nefarious applications of generative artificial intelligence and large languagemodels. In Computers and Society. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00737

Floridi, L. (2023). The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Principles, Challenges, and Opportunities. Oxford University Press.

Flower, L. & J.R. Hayes (1981). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 39 (4), 365-387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600

Gasson, S., Bruce, Ch., & C. Maybee (2020). Creating collaborative capacity in early career research writers. In TEXT: Journal of Writing and Writing Programs (24), Speccial Issues 59. https://doi.org/10.52086/001C.23460

Given, L. M., & Willson, R. (2015). Collaboration, information seeking, and technology use: A critical examination of humanities scholars’ research practices. In P. Hansen, C. Shah, & C.-P. Klas (Eds.), Collaborative information seeking.Springer International Publishing, 139-164. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-18988-8_8

Given, L. M., Case, D. O., & Willson, R. (2023). Looking for Information: Examining Research on How People Engagewith Information (5th ed.). Emerald.

Gonsalves, Ch. (2024). Generative AI´s impact on Critical Thinking: Revisiting Bloom´s Taxonomy. In J. MarketingEducation. 0(0) 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753241305980

Gorichanaz, T. (2019). Information creation and models of information behaviour: grounding synthesis and further research. In Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51 (4), 998-1006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618769968

Gorichanaz, T. (2020). Information Experience in Theory and Design. Emerald Publishing Limited.

Gorichanaz, T. (2023). Accused: How students respond to allegations of using ChatGPT on assessments. In Learning: Research and Practice, 9 (2), 183-196.

Grant, V. (2024). A creative future of information and digital literacy. In Journal of Information Literacy. Vol. 18, (1), 14-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.11645/18.1.577

Greene Taylor, Natalie & O. T. Jaeger (2022). Foundations of Information Literacy. Chicago: ALA-Neal Schuman 2022. 245 s.

Haider, J., & Sundin, O. (2022). Paradoxes of Media and Information Literacy: The Crisis of Information. Routledge.

Hamelink, C. (1976). An alternative to news. In Journal of Communication, 20, (1976), 120-123.

Hemlin, S., Olsson, L., & Denti, L. (2013). Creativity in R&D. In Handbook of research on creativity. Ed. by J. Chan, R. Kerry Thomas, Gothenburg Research Institute, Edward Elgar Publ. 2013, 508-521. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/SvenHemlin/publication/263369033_CREATIVITY_IN_RD_Introduction/links/00b7d53aad1d97494b000000/CREATIVITY-IN-R-D-Introduction.pdf

Herman, Eti & David Nicholas (2019). Scholarly reputation building in the digital age: An activity-specific approach. Review article. El profesional de la información, v. 28, (1), 2019. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.ene.02

Hicks, A.; Lloyd, A. & O. Pilerot (2024). Information Literacy Through Theory. Facet.

Hicks, A. (2024). The negative spaces of information literacy: An alternative research agenda. In Journal of InformationLiteracy. Vol. 18, Iss. 1, 123-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.11645/18.1.598

Hirvonen, N. (2024). Information literacy after the AI revolution. In Journal of Information Literacy. Vol. 18, (1), 47-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.11645/18.1.593

Hmoud, M. & A. Shaquir (2024). AIEd Bloom´s Taxonomy: a Proposed Model for Enhancing Educational Efficiency and Effectiveness in the Artificial Intelligence Era. In The International Journal of Technologies in Learning, 31, (2), 2024, 111-128. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0144/CGP/v31i02/111-128

Hort, S. (2020). Digital Writing, Word Processors and Operations in Texts: How Students Writers Use Digital Resources in Academic Writing Processes. In J. of Academic Writing, Vol. 10, (1),Winter 2020, 43-58 https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v10i1.596

Howkins, J. (2009). Creative Ecologies. Where Thinking is a Proper Job. Transaction Publishers.

Hrdináková, Ľ. & J. Fázik (2021). Dimenzie digitálnej gramotnosti. In Knižničná a informačná veda 29. Ed. J. Steinerová. Bratislava: UK 2021, 169-189.

Hrdináková, Ľ. & J. Fázik (2023). Etické aspekty štandardov informačnej gramotnosti. In Knižničná a informačná veda. 30. Ed. J. Steinerová. Bratislava: UK 2023, 164-193.

Huvila, I. (2021). Making and Taking Information. In Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73 (4), 528-541. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24599

Huvila, I., Douglas, J., Gorichanaz, T., Koh, J., & Suorsa, A. (2022). Guest editorial: Advances in research on information creation. In Library & Information Science Research, 44 (3), 101178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101178

Huvila, I., & T. Gorichanaz, T. (2024). Trends in information behavior research, 2016–2022: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology paper. In Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24943

Joshi, A. Srinivas, Ch., Firat, E.E., & R.Laramee (2024). Evaluating the Recommendations of LLMs to teach Visualization Technique using Bloom´s Taxonomy. In IST International Symposium on Electronic Imaging, Visualizationand Data Analysis. 2024. Society for Imaging Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.2352/EI.2024.36.1.VDA-360

Khalifa, Mohamed & M. Albadawy (2024). Using Artificial Intelligence in academic writing and research: an essential productivity tool. In Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update. 2024, vol. 5., 100145. ISSN 2666-9900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145

Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & A. K. Caspari (2012). Guided Inquiry Design: A Framework for Inquiry in Your School. Libraries Unlimited.

Lancaster, Thomas (2025). Generative AI for Academic Writing: Case Studies Beyond Simple Chatbot Interactions. In Journal of Academic Writing, Vol. 15 (S1) 2025, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v15iS1.1067

Limberg, L., Sundin, O.,& S. Talja (2012). Three Theoretical Perspectives on Information Literacy. In Human IT , 11 (2), 93-130. https://humanit.hb.se/article/view/69

Lloyd, A. (2021). The Qualitative Landscape of Information Literacy Research: Perspective, Methods and Research. Facet.

Lupton, D. et al. (ed.) (2018). The Digital Academic. Critical Perspectives on Digital Technologies in Higher Education(2018). Ed. by D. Lupton, I. Mewburn, P. Thomson. New York: Routledge 2018. ISBN: 978-1-315-47361-1 (ebk).

Mackey, T. P. & T. R. Jacobson. (2019). Metaliterate Learning for the Post-truth World. Chicago: ALA 2019. 230 p. ISBN 978-0-8389-1776-3.

Malik A.R., Pratiwi Y, Andajani K, Numertayasa I.W., Suharti S, & A. Darwis (2023). Exploring artificial intelligence in academic essay: higher education student’s perspective. In Int J Educ Res Open, vol. 5:100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296

Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. In Cogent Education, 10 (2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469

McKenna, C. (2015). Digital writing as transformative: instantiating academic literacies in theory and practice. In Working with academic literacies: case studies towards transformative practice. Ed. Th. Lillis, K. Harrington, M.R. Leas, S. Mitchell. WAC Clearinghouse, Parloe Press 2015, 317-325.

McKenzie, P. & N. K. Dalmer, (2020). „This is really interesting, I never even thought about this“. Methodological strategies for studying invisible information work. In: Nordic Journal of Library and Information Studies. 1 (2). https://doi.10.7146/njlis.v1i2.120437

Miller, F. Q. (2015). Experiencing information use for early career academics’ learning: A knowledge ecosystem model. In Journal of Documentation, 71 (6), 1228–1249. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-04-2014-0058

Mizrachi, D. & Bates, M. (2013). Undergraduate´s personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task urgency. In JASIST, 2013, Vol. 64, (8), 1590-1609. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22849

Multas, A.-M., Suorsa, A., Keränen, T., & H. Enwald (2025). From collaboration to co-creation: investigating information creation as mediated action in a research group workshop. In Library and Information Science Research, 47 (2025), 101355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101355

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & M.S. Qiao (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. In Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041

Ngyuen, A., Hong, Y, Dang, B., & X. Huang (2024). Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing. In Studies in Higher Education, 49 (5), 847-864. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2323593

Nicholas, D., Herman, E., Xu, J., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Abdullah, A., Watkinson, A., & Rodríguez-Bravo, B. (2018). Early career researchers' quest for reputation in the digital age. In Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 49 (4), 375-396.https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.49.4.01

Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Boukacem‐Zeghmouri, C., Rodríguez‐Bravo, B., Xu, J., Abrizah, A., ... & Herman, E. (2019). So, are early career researchers the harbingers of change? In Learned Publishing, 32 (3), 237-247.

Nylander, E., & M. Hjort (2020). Information Literacies of PhD Students: A Hermeneutic Dialectic Study within the Health Sciences. In New Review of Academic Librarianship, 28 (2), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1819353

Paul, M., Deja, M., Kisilowska-Szurmińska, M., Głowacka, E., Świgoń, M., & M. Wojciechowska. (2024). Understanding information literacy among doctoral students: An ILDoc model and assessment tool. In The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50 (2), 102855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102855

Pilerot, O. & L. Limberg (2015). The Enactment of Information Literacy: An Exploratory Study Among Interdisciplinary PhD Students. In: Kurbanoglu, S., Boustany, J., Špiranec, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Roy, L. (eds). InformationLiteracy: Moving Toward Sustainability. ECIL 2015. CCIS, vol 552. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28197-1_48

Pinto, M., Fernandez-Ramos, A., Sanchez, G., & G. Meneses (2013). Information competence of doctoral students in information science in Spain and Latin America: A self-assessment. In The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39 (2), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.08.006

Salvagno, M., Taccone, F. & A.G. Gerli (2023). Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? In Critical Care,Vol. 27 (1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2

Semeler, A. R., Pinto, A.L., Koltay, T., Rodrigues Dias, T.M., Oliveira, A.L., Moreiro Gonzáles, J.A., & H.B. Frota Rozados (2024). Algorithmic Literacy: Generative Artificial Intellligence Technologies for Data Librarians. In EAIEndorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems. Vol. 11, (2), 2024, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.4067

Spezi, V. (2016). Is information-seeking behavior of doctoral students changing?: A review of the literature (2010–2015). In New Review of Academic Librarianship, 22 (1), 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2015.1127831

Strobl C., Ailhaud E., Benetos K., Devitt A., Kruse O., Proske A. & C. Rapp (2019). Digital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and pedagogies. In Computers & Education. Vol. 131, April 2019, 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.005

Savolainen, R., & L Thomson (2022). Assessing the theoretical potential of an expanded model for everyday information practices. In Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(4), 511-527. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24589

Steinerová, J. (2013). Methodological literacy of doctoral students – an emerging model. In S. Kurbanoğlu, E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi, R. Catts, & S. Špiranec (Eds.), In Worldwide Commonalities and Challenges in Information Literacy Research and Practice: European Conference, ECIL 2013. Rev. Sel. Papers, 148-154. Springer.

Steinerová, J. (2014). Information Horizons Mapping for Information Literacy Development. In: Kurbanoglu, S., et al. (eds) Information Literacy. Lifelong Learning and Digital Citizenship in the 21st Century. ECIL 2014. CCIS 492, 70-80. Springer, Heidelberg.

Steinerová, J. (2014a). Ecological Information Interactions for Digital Scholarship. In: Cognitive Traveling in DigitalSpace of the Web and Digital Libraries. Yield of the Interdisciplinary Multi-Partner project TraDiCe. Eds. P. Návrat, M. Bieliková, M. Laclavík, J. Paralič, J. Steinerová. Bratislava: STU 2014, 158-169

Steinerová, J. (2015). Looking for Creative Information Strategies and Ecological Literacy. In Information Literacy:Moving Toward Sustainability: Third European Conference, ECIL 2015. Revised Selected Papers (pp. 3-12). Springer.

Steinerová, J. (2020). Informačná tvorivosť. In Steinerová, J. a Ondrišová,, M. Informačná veda. Výkladový slovník. Bratislava: vyd. UK 2020, 133-134.

Steinerová, J. (2021). Etika tvorby informačných produktov v digitálnej revolúcii. In: ProInflow: časopis pro informační vědy. Vol. 13, (1), 2021, 64–86 https://doi.org/10.5817/ProIn2021-1-4 CC BY 3.0 CZ

Steinerová, J. (2024). Informačná etika vo vzťahoch človeka a informácie v informačnej vede. Bratislava: Vyd. UK 2024. 252 s. ISBN 978-80-223-5772-2.ISBN 978-80-223-5773-9 (online). https://stella.uniba.sk/texty/FIF_JS_inf_etika_clovek-informacie_inf_veda.pdf

Steinerová, Jela (ed.) (2025). Informačná tvorivosť a umelá inteligencia. Information creativity and artificial intelligence. Annual Review of LIS. Vol. 31. Zborník KIV 31. Bratislava: vyd. UK 2025. 215 s. ISBN 978-80-223-5892-7 (online). ISBN 978-80-223-5891-0. https://stella.uniba.sk/texty/FIF_kiv-31_inf_tvorivost_umela_inteligencia.pdf

Steinerová, Jela (2025). Informačná tvorivosť: konceptuálne a ekologické základy. In Informačná tvorivosť a umeláinteligencia / Information Creativity and Artificial Intelligence. Zborník KIV. Vol. 31. Bratislava: UK 2025, 14-37. https://stella.uniba.sk/texty/FIF_kiv-31_inf_tvorivost_umela_inteligencia.pdf

Steinerová, J., Fázik, J., & Nováková, F. (2020). Prínos fenomenografických výskumov pre informačnú vedu. In ProInflow, 12 (1), 3-28. http://www.phil.muni.cz/journals/index.php/proinflow/article/view/2020-1-2/2102

Steinerová, J., Šušol, J., & Grešková, M. (2007). Prieskum relevancie informácií: výsledky analýz rozhovorov sdoktorandmi FiFUK. Bratislava: CVTI SR.

Świgoń, M. (2023). How do early career researchers perceive success in their fields? Report on interviews with humanists, theologians and scientists – artists in Poland. In ZIN 2023, 61(2), 32–49. https://doi.10.36702/zin2023.02.02

Taha, S., Kaba, A., & M.A. Al-Qeed (2024). Exploring students’ perceptions toward the use of augmented reality for digital library services. In Digital Library Perspectives, 40 (1), 53-66.

Townsend, L., Hofer, A.R., Hanick, S.L. & K. Brunetti, (2016). Identifying Threshold Concepts for Information Literacy: A Delphi Study. In Communication in Information Literacy, Vol. 10 (1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.1.13

Tubella, A. A.; Mora-Cantallops, M. & J. C. Nieves (2023). How to teach Responsible AI in higher education: challengesand responsibilities. In Ethics and Information Technology. 26 (3), 1 – 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-023-09733-7

UNESCO (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Development Education 2030. UNESCO 2019. 47p. https://en.unesco.org/themes/education-policyplanning/

UNESCO (2023). ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education. https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/ChatGPT-and-Artificial-Intelligence-in-higher-education-Quick-Start-guide_EN_FINAL.pdf

Vinchon, F., Lubart, T., Bartolotta, S., Gironnay, V., Botella, M., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., ... & A. Gaggioli (2023). Artificial Intelligence & Creativity: A manifesto for collaboration. In The Journal of Creative Behavior, 57 (4), 472-484.

Waardenburg, L., & M. Huysman, M (2022). From coexistence to co-creation: Blurring boundaries in the age of AI. In Information and Organization, 32 (4), 100432. https://doi.org/10.1916/j.infoandorg.2022.100432

Wan, R., Li, Jia-Jun T., Gebreeziagbehr, S., & Karla Badillo-Urquiola (2024). Co-Co Matrix: Taxonomy of Cognitive Contributions in Co-Writing with Intelligent Agents. In Creativity and Cognition (C&C 24), June 23-26, Chicago, IL, USA. ACM. New York, NY. USA. 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3635636.3664260

Webber, S. & B. Johnston (2014). Transforming Information Literacy for Higher Education in the 21st Century: A Lifelong Learning Approach. In Developing People’s Information Capabilities: Fostering Information Literacy in Educational, Workplace and Community Contexts (LIS, Vol. 8), Emerald Group Publ. Ltd, Leeds, 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1876-0562(2013)0000008006

Whitworth, A. (2020). Mapping information landscapes. New methods for exploring and development and teaching information literacy. Facet. 201 s.

Willson, R. (2022). “Bouncing ideas” as a complex information practice: information seeking, sharing, creation, and cooperation. In Journal of Documentation, 78 (4), 800-816. https://doi.org/10.47989/ir292854

Willson, R. & Given L.M. (2020). “I´m in a sheer survival mode”: Information behavior and affective experiences of early academic career academics. Library and Information Science Research. 42 (2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2020.101014

Willson, R., Stewart-Robertson, O., Julien, H., & L.M. Given (2024). Isolated, individualised, and immobilised: information behaviour in the context of academic casualisation. In Information Research, 29 (2), 652-668. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2107850

Wingström, R., Hautala, J. & R. Lundman (2024). Redefining Creativity in the Era of AI? Perspectives of Computer Scientists and New Media Artists. In Creativity Research Journal, 36 (2), 177-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2107850

Wiorogórska, Z. (2015). Field-specific information needs of doctoral students in psychology. A comparative study. In S. S. Kurbanoglu, et al. (Eds.), Information literacy: Moving toward sustainability. ECIL 2015, rev. sel. papers 3. Springer Int. Publ., 375-382. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-28197-1_38

Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatPGT on Learners in a L2 Writing Practicum: An Exploratory Investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 13943-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4

Zhao, X., Cox, A. & Cai, L. (2024). ChatGPT and the Digitisation of Writing. In Humanities & Social SciencesCommunications. 11, 482. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02904-x

Zurkowski, P. G. (1974). The Information Service Environment Relationships and Priorities. Related Paper No. 5. Washington, D.C., National Commission on Libraries and Information Science. National Program for Library and Information Services. Nov. 1974. 30 p.