Peer review

Each paper submitted to the editorial office is subsequently sent to two independent reviewers. The peer review process is double-blind and consists of two parts: a personalised assessment intended for the editorial office (regarding the authenticity and quality of the paper) and anonymous comments addressed to the author of the paper (evaluated are the argumentative structure of the paper, its linguistic aspect, accuracy of the abstract and key words, bibliography, the quality and relevance of pictorial documentation a. o.).

The author is immediately informed about the outcome of the process and asked to revise his/her manuscript in response to the suggestions of the peer reviewers. If the reviewers do not recommend to accept the paper, it is rejected from further evaluation. The final decision on publication always lies with the Chief Editor of the journal. No financial compensation for publication in this journal is available.

Reviewer evaluation forms for download: Czech, English.

Contact the Executive Editors Svitlana Shurma and Eliška Raiterová for further information (theatralia@phil.muni.cz).

See also Publication ethics and malpractice statement.

Note: The author may suggest potential reviewers to the editorial board. Additionally, the author has the right to request that certain experts not be approached as reviewers, provided there are valid reasons (e.g., conflicts of interest). However, the final decision regarding the selection of reviewers remains solely at the discretion of the editorial board.