[Universals of language today. Edited by Sergio Scalise, Elisabetta Magni, Antonietta Bisetto]
Roč.57,č.1-2(2009)
267–269
Benveniste, E. 1967. Fondements syntaxiques de la composition nominale. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 62/1, 15–31. – reprint in E. Benveniste: Problèmes de linguistique générale II. Paris 1974, 145–162.
Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford.
Dryer, M. S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68, 81–138. | DOI 10.1353/lan.1992.0028
Dryer, M. S. 1997. Are grammatical relations universal? In: Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givón. Ed. J. Bybee, J. Haiman a S. Thompson. Amsterdam – Philadelphia, 115–143.
Haspelmath, M. 2000. The Agglutination Hypothesis: A belated empirical investigation. http://email.eva.mpg.de/~haspelmt/Wien00.pdf
Haspelmath, M. 2007. Pre‑established categories don't exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11, 119–132 | DOI 10.1515/LINGTY.2007.011
Martinet, A. 1975. Studies in Functional Syntax. München.
Newmeyer, F. J. 2007. Linguistic typology requires crosslinguistic formal categories. Linguistic Typology 11, 133–157. | DOI 10.1515/LINGTY.2007.012