Hittite i-stems revisited – from Hrozný to the present day : preliminary study

Dita Frantíková

doi:10.5817/LB2019-2-3

Hittite i-stems revisited – from Hrozný to the present day : preliminary study

Roč.67,č.2(2019)

Dita Frantíková

https://doi.org/10.5817/LB2019-2-3

Trvalý odkaz (handle):
http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/141960

PDF (angličtina)

Abstrakt

Though the Hittite i-stems were examined by several scholars in the last and in the beginning of this century, the available material calls for revision of the provisional conclusions. While the basic features were recognized by Hrozný in 1917 and elaborated later by others, generalizations were based on restricted data sets which from then are being enlarged almost every year by new word forms found on cuneiform tablets. The i-stem class is the Hittite second largest nominal class, with over a thousand recorded lexemes. It is unique for the high number of borrowings and words of unknown origin, as shown in comparison with the u-stem class. Its reassessment is necessary, as pointed out by the discrepancies between what is expected to be known about this class and what seems to be an outcome of data analysis.

Klíčová slova:
Hittite morphology; i-stems; nominal class

Stránky:
31–37

Reference

Berman, Howard. 1972. The stem formation of Hittite nouns and adjectives. Chicago, Illinois. Dissertation. University of Chicago.

Friedrich, Johannes. 1922. Die hethitische Sprache. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenlandischen Gesellschaft 76, 153–173.

Friedrich, Johannes. 1935. Zum Subaräischen und Urartäischen. In: Festschrift A. Deimel. Analecta Orientalia 12. Roma: Pontificum Institutum Biblicum, 122–135.

Harðarson, Jón Axel. 1987. Zum indogermanischen Kollektivum. Münchner Studien zum Sprachwissenschaft, Heft 48. München: R. Kitzinger, 71–114.

Hrozný, Friedrich. 1917. Die Sprache der Hethiter. Ihr Bau und ihre Zugehörigkeit zum indogermanischen Sprachstamm. Leipzig: J.C. Hindrichs'sche Buchhandlung.

Kronasser, Heinz. 1956. Vergleichende Laut- und Formenlehre des Hethitischen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.

Kronasser, Heinz. 1966. Etymologie der hethitischen Sprache. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrasowitz.

Rieken, Elizabeth. 2016. Zum luwischen Ursprung von LÚta/uḫ(uk)kanti- 'Kronprinz'. In: Marquardt, Henning – Reichmuth, Silvio –Trabazo, José Virgilio García, eds. Anatolica et Indogermanica. Studia linguistica in honorem Johannis Tischler septuagenarii dedicata. Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 155. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck, 267–277.

Rössle, Sylvester. 2002. Sprachvergleichende Untersuchungen zu den hethitischen āi-Stämmen: ein Beitrag zur hethitischen Sprachgeschichte. Augsburg. Dissertaiton. Augsburg University (mikrofische).

Starke, Frank. 1990. Untersuchungen zur Stammbildung des keilschrift-luwischen Nomens. Studien zu den Boghazköy Texten 31. Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz Verlag.

Strauss, Rita. 2006. Reinigungsrituale aus Kizzuwatna. Berlin – New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Sturtevant, Edgar Howard. 1937. Latin and Hittite Substantive i-stems with Lengthened Grade in the Nominative. In: Hjemslev, Louis, ed. Fs Pedersen. Mélanges linguistiques offerts à M. Holger Pedersen. Acta Jutlandica 9(1). Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard, 57–62.

Weitenberg, Joseph Johannes Sicco. 1984. Die hethitischen u-Stämme. Amsterdam. Academisch proefschrift. Rodopi.

Zucha, Ivo. 1988. The nominal stem types in Hittite. Trinity term. Dissertation. Christ Chruch.

Metriky