Dative as the unmarked unmarked case in Hungarian

Baker, Mark. 2015. Case: Its Principles and Parameters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In: Martin, Roger – Michaels, David – Uriagereka, Juan, eds. Step by Step, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 89–155.

Dékány, Éva. 2018. The position of case markers relative to possessive agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36(2), pp. 365–400. | DOI 10.1007/s11049-017-9379-7

Den Dikken, Marcel. 1999. On the structural representation of possession and agreement. The case of (anti-)agreement in Hungarian possessed nominal phrases. In: Kenesei, István, ed. Crossing Boundaries: Theoretical Advances in Central and Eastern European Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 137–178.

É. Kiss, Katalin. 2014. Ways of licensing Hungarian external possessors. Acta Linguictica Hungarica 61, pp. 45–68. | DOI 10.1556/ALing.61.2014.1.2

Grimshaw, Jane. 2005. Extended projection. In: Grimshaw, Jane, ed. Words and Structure, Stanford, Ca.: CSLI, pp. 1–74.

Mailing, Joan – Sprouse, Rex A. 1995. Structural Case, Specifier-Head Relations, and the Case of Predicate NPs. In: Haider, Hubert – Olsen, Susan – Vikner, Sten, eds. Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 167–186.

Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. In: Westphal, Germán F. et al., eds. Proceedings of ESCOL '91. Baltimore: University of Maryland, pp. 234–253.

McFadden, Thomas – Sandhya Sundaresan. 2011. Nominative case is independent of finiteness and agreement. Available at: http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001350.

Newson, Mark. 2018. Default Case. In: Newson, Mark – Szigetvári, Péter, eds. The Even Year Book 13, Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University, pp. 29–55.

Newson, Mark. 2019. Unmarked accusative in non-finite domains: the English acc-ing gerund. In: Emonds, Joseph – Janebová, Markéta – Veselovská, Ludmila, eds. Language Use and Linguistic Structure: proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2018, Olomouc Modern Language Series Vol. 7, Oloumuc: Palacký University, pp. 65–78.

Sabbagh, Joseph. 2007. Ordering and linearizing rightward movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25, pp. 349–401. | DOI 10.1007/s11049-006-9011-8

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1983. The possessor that ran away from home. The Linguistic Review 3, pp. 89–102.

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1994. The noun phrase. In: Kiefer, Ferenc – É. Kiss, Katalin, eds. The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian. Syntax and Semantics 27. San Diego/New York: Academic Press, pp. 179–274.

Szabolcsi, Anna. 2009. Overt nominative subjects in infinitival complements in Hungarian. In Den Dikken, Marcel – Vago, Robert, eds. Approaches to Hungarian, vol. 11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 251–276.

Szécsényi, Krisztina. 2018. Control and the left periphery: The scope and information structure properties of Hungarian infinitival complements with nominative, dative, and covert subjects. In: Bartos, Huba – den Dikken, Marcel – Bánréti, Zoltán – Váradi, Tamás, eds. Boundaries Crossed, at the Interfaces of Morphosyntax, Phonology, Pragmatics and Semantics. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. New York: Springer, pp. 279–295.

Ürögdi Barbara. 2006. Predicate fronting and dative case in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 53(3), pp. 291–332. | DOI 10.1556/ALing.53.2006.3.3

Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1977. Open letter to Chomsky and Lasnik. Reprinted as Letter to Noam Chomsky and Howard Lasnik on "Filters and Control," April 17, 1977. In: Freidin, Robert – Otero, Carlos P. – Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa, eds. Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 3–15.