Bedeutung als Gebrauchsregel? : über das Scheitern einer pragmatischen Sprachtheorie

Roč.39,č.1(2025)

Abstrakt
Rudi Keller has presented an instrumental conception of the sign which defines the meaning of the linguistic sign as a 'rule of use' and which is directed against the classical theory of representation or substitution as an alternative. In doing so, he draws upon Ludwig Wittgenstein's Philosophische Untersuchungen and Ernst Tugendhat's Einführung in die sprachanalytische Philosophie. Since Tugendhat also adopts Wittgenstein´s concept of the rule of use, but, unlike Keller, uses it to elucidate the representational performance of language, I should like to discuss the relationship between these definitions of meaning (meaning as representational content vs. meaning as a rule of use) in the work of both thinkers. By doing so, I will hold that language is not initially a means of communication and that the perspective and research methods adopted from the natural sciences, as we find them in Keller's pragmatic meaning theory, are unsuitable for the human sciences. More precisely, my essay presents a) Keller's theory of meaning, b) Tugendhat's criticism of Grice's perlocutionism, c) Roman Jakobson's reasons for keeping (isolated) word-understanding and (contextual) word-utilisation apart. Finally, Joseph Levine's model example is shown in explaining d) the inapplicability of the scientific method in the field of human science.

Klíčová slova:
pragmatische Bedeutungstheorie; Naturalismus in der Linguistik; Rudi Keller; Roman Jakobson; Joseph Levine; Ernst Tugendhat

Stránky:
5–27
Reference

Austen Clark, Austen (1993): Sensory Qualities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Flanagan, Owen (1992): Consciousness Reconsidered, Bradford Books/MIT Press.

Grice, Hebert (1968): Utterer's Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning, in: Foundations of Language : Vol. 4, No. 3, 225-242, Springer Nature | DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-2727-8_2

Goldstein, Kurt (1948): Language and Language Disturbances: Aphasic Symptom Complexes and Their Significance for Medicine and Theory of Language, University of Michigan: Grune & Stratton.

Husserl, Edmund (1993): Logische Untersuchungen II/1, Tübingen, Max Niemeyer Verlag.

Jakobson, Roman (2002): Two Aspects of Language and Two Types of Aphasic Disturbances, in: Jakobson, Roman & Hale, Moris (2002): Fundamentals of Language, Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter Berlin. | DOI 10.1515/9783110889611-003

Keller, Rudi (2018): Zeichentheorie: Eine pragmatische Theorie semiotischen Wissens, Tübingen: E. Francke Verlag Tübingen.

Levine, Joseph (2004): Purple Haze. The Puzzle of Consciousness 1, Oxford: Oxford University.

Lewontin, Richard C. (1997): Biologie jako ideologie, Brno: Jota.

Masaryk, Tomáš (1887): Versuch einer concreten Logik, Wien: Verlag von Carl Konegen.

Nagel, Thomas (1974): What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review 82: 430-450.

Neuland, Eva (1975): Sprachbarrieren oder Klassensprache, Frankfurt am Main: Fischer-Taschenbuch-Verlag.

Quine, Willard Van Orman (1960): Word and Object. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Rubáš, Michal (2018): Bewusstsein und Repräsentation in der Sprache, in: Horňáček, Milan; Krappmann, Jörg; Rinas Karsten (Hg.): Vom Nutzen diskursanalytischer Verfahren: 13-36 Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.

Rubáš, Michal (2019): Zeichen und die epistemische Asymmetrie, in: Brünner Beiträge zur Germanistik und Nordistik 33/1: 37-51, Brno: Masarykova univerzita | DOI 10.5817/bbgn2019-1-3

Tugendhat, Ernst (1976): Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die sprachanalytische Philosophie, Frankfurt am Main Suhrkamp Verlag

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1999): Philosophische Untersuchungen, in: Ludwig Wittgenstein Werkausgabe Band 1, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 231-485, zugänglich unter: https://mickindex.sakura.ne.jp/wittgenstein/witt_pu_gm.html

Metriky

0

Crossref logo

0

Views

0

PDF (němčina) views