Doe zelf eens normaal, communistische smeris! : een vergelijking van ontoelaatbaar taalgebruik in de parlementen van Nederland en Tsjechië

Bd.31,Nr.1(2017)

Pim van der Horst

https://doi.org/10.5817/BBGN2017-1-11

##submission.handle##:
http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/137324

PDF
Abstract
Impolite language has a firm place in political interaction. In this article the author will compare the use of impolite language in the parliaments of the Netherlands and Czech Republic and find out why impolite language is used in a political context, in what form and if there are differences between the use of unacceptable language in the parliaments of the Netherlands and Czech Republic. The article starts with an overview of the concept of linguistic (im)politeness and relevant research in the field and examines the influence of the political context on the use of impolite language by politicians. Furthermore, an overview of utterances of impolite language in the parliaments of the Netherlands and Czech Republic is given, in order to compare the use of unacceptable parliamentary language in both countries.

Schlagworte:
pragmatics; linguistic impoliteness; parliamentary discourse; political discourse; politeness

##munipress.pages##:
129–142
Literaturhinweise

BAKER, Anne E., DON, Jan, KEES, Hengeveld (red.) (2013): Taal en taalwetenschap. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.

BOOTSMA, P., HOETINK, C. (2006): Over lijken. Ontoelaatbaar taalgebruik in de Tweede Kamer. Boom, Amsterdam.

BOUSFIELD, Derek (2008): Impoliteness in Interaction. John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia.

BOUSFIELD, Derek, LOCHER, Miriam (red.) (2008): Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlijn.

BROWN, Penelope, LEVINSON, Stephen C. (1987): Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

ČMEJRKOVÁ, S. en J. HOFFMANOVÁ (red.) (2011): Mluvená čeština: hledání funkčního rozpětí. Academia, Praag.

CULPEPER, Jonathan (1996): Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. In: Journal of Pragmatics 25, 349–367.

CULPEPER, Jonathan (2010): Conventionalised impoliteness formulae. In: Journal of Pragmatics 42 (2010), 3232–3245.

CULPEPER, Jonathan (2011): Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

CULPEPER, Jonathan (2012): (Im)politeness: Three issues. In: Journal of Pragmatics 44 (2012), 1128–1133.

CULPEPER, Jonathan, BOUSFIELD, Derek, WICHMANN, Anne (2003): Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. In: Journal of Pragmatics 35, 1545–1579.

GOFFMAN, Erving (1967): Interactional Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behavior. Anchor Books, Garden City, New York.

HIRSCHOVÁ, M. (2013): Pragmatika v čestině. Karolinum, Praag.

ILIE, Cornelia (2010): Analytical perspectives on parliamentary and extra-parliamentary discourses. In: Journal of Pragmatics 42 (2010), 879–884.

ILIE, Cornelia (2003): Discourse en metadiscourse in parliamentary debates. In: Journal of Language and Politics 1 (2), 269–291.

LEECH, Geoffrey N. (1983): Principles of Pragmatics. Longman, London.

LIMBERG, Holger (2009): Impoliteness and threat responses. In: Journal of Pragmatics 41 (2009), 1376–1394.

LOCHER, Miriam A., WATTS, Richard J. (2005): Politeness theory and relational work. In: Journal of Politeness Research 1, 9–33.

VAN OUDENHOVEN, Jan Pieter, DE RAAD, Boele (2008): ' Eikels en trutten over de grens'. In: Onze Taal (9) 2008, 228–231.

WATTS, Richard J. (2003): Politeness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Metriky

0

Crossref logo

7

Views

0

PDF views

PDF