Geautomatiseerde evaluatie van juridische vertaling tussen kleinere talen

Milan Potočár; Benjamin Bossaert

doi:10.5817/BBGN2019-2-4

Automatic evaluation of legal translation between languages of lesser diffusion

Vol.33,No.2(2019)

Milan Potočár Benjamin Bossaert

https://doi.org/10.5817/BBGN2019-2-4

Stable URL (handle):
http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/142845

PDF (German)

Abstract

In this contribution, problems of assessing legal translations and its objectivity will be discussed. Objective assessment proves to be a difficult issue in particular when assessing rare language combinations, such as Slovak – Dutch or Dutch – Czech, since not so much competent translators and assessors are available in these combinations. In this context, we propose a method based on the PIE method and Segers' and Kockaert's benchmark method, which, by means of a consensus ratio, can significantly increase the objectivity of text assessments.

Keywords:
legal translation; evaluation; assessment; languages of lesser diffusion; consensus ratio; benchmarks; objectivity

Pages:
35–43

References

Al-Qinai, Jamal. (2000): Translation Quality Assessment. Strategies, Parametres and Procedures. In: Meta: Translators’ Journal, 41(155), p. 497–519.

Catford, John C. (1978): A Linguistic Theory of Translation. Oxford: University Press.

Richtlijn 2010/64/EU van het Europese Parlement en Commissie. < http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:280:0001:0007:en:PDF>

EULITA. (2013): Assises de la Justice. Preliminary Input to the Discussion: Completing the European Area of Justice - Tell us what comes next.

Hansen, Gyde (2006): Erfolgreich Übersetzen. Entdecken und Beheben von Störquellen. Tübingen: Narr.

Hertog, Erik; Vanden Bosch, Yolanda (2001): Access to Justice across Language. In: Erik Hertog (ed.): Aequitas_Acces to Justice across Language and Culture in the EU. Antwerpen: Lessius Hogeschool.

Hrehovčík, Teodor (2006): Prekladateľské minimum. Bratislava: Iris.

Kockaert, Hendrik; Segers, Winibert (2014): Evaluation de la traduction: la méthode PIE (Preselected Items Evaluation). In: Turjuman, 23(2), p. 232–250.

Lee-Jahnke, Hannelore (2001): Aspects pédagogiques de l’évaluation des traduction. In: Meta: Translators’ Journal 46, 46(2), p. 258–271. | DOI 10.7202/003447ar

Orlando, Danielle (2015): The Trials of Legal Translation Competence: Triangulating processes and products of translators vs. Lawyers. Trieste: Università degli Studi di Trieste.

Potočár, Milan (2016): Juridische vertaling tussen kleinere talen evalueren: Kwaliteitscriteria voor juridische vertaling onderdeel van het onderzoeksproject TransIus. In: Roczniki Humanistyczne, 64(5), p. 155–164.

Potočár, Milan (2017): Von der Evaluierung zum Qualitätsmanagement. In J. Rakšányiová et al. [et al.], Quo vadis, Rechtsübersetzung?. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, p. 221–252.

Prieto Ramos, Fernando. (2011): Developing Legal Translation Competence: An Integrative Process-Oriented Approach. In: Comparative Legilinguistics - International Journal for Legal Communication, 5, p. 7–21.

Segers, Winibert; Kockaert, Hendrik (2016): Can Subjectivity be Avoided in Translation Evaluation? In: Marcel Thelen / Gys-Walt Van Egdom / Dirk Verbeeck / Łukasz Bogucki / Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (ed.): Translation and Meaning. vol. 1, 41. Łódź: Peter Lang, p. 69–78.

Segers, Winibert; Van den Poel, Chris (2007): Vertalingen objectief evalueren. Matrices en ijkpunten. Leuven / Voorburg: Acco.

Štefková, Markéta (2013a): Aktuálne výzvy výskumu súdneho prekladu v slovenskom kontekste. Prezentácia projektu TRANSIUS – Od konvencií k normám prekladu v právnom diskurze. In: Zuzana Guldanová (ed.): Konteksty súdneho tlmočenia a preklad 2. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, p. 124–134.

Štefková, Markéta (2013b): Právny tekst v preklade. Translatologické aspekty právnej komunikácie v málo rozšírených jazykoch. Bratislava: Iura Edition.

www1. (2017): Jednotný automatizovaný systém právnych informácií. http://jaspi.justice.gov.sk/

Metrics