Od teorie k praxi: Od plánování dialogického vyučování k jeho reflexi

[1] Alexander, R. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching. York: Dialogos.

[2] Bleicher, R. E., Tobin, K. G., & McRobbin, C. J. (2003). Opportunities to talk science in a high school chemistry classroom. Research in Science Education, 33(3), 319–339. | DOI 10.1023/A:1025480311414

[3] Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge Falmer.

[4] Cullen, R. (2002). Supportive teacher talk: The importance of the follow-up in english language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[5] Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12. | DOI 10.3102/0013189X023007005

[6] Education indicators in focus 2012/09 (2012). Paris: OECD.

[7] Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge. London: Methuen/Routledge.

[8] Freese, A. R. (2006). Reframing one's teaching: Discovering our teacher selves through reflection and inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(1), 100–119. | DOI 10.1016/j.tate.2005.07.003

[9] Hartford, J., & MacRuairc, G. (2008). Engaging student teachers in meaningful reflective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1884–1892. | DOI 10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.010

[10] Hatton, N., &, Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33–49. | DOI 10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U

[11] Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843. | DOI 10.1002/tea.20171

[12] Kiemer, K., Gröschner, A., Pehmer, A. K., & Seidel, T. (2015). Effects of a classroom discourse intervention on teachers' practice and students' motivation to learn mathematics and science. Learning and Instruction, 35(1), 94–103. | DOI 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.10.003

[13] Lehesvuori, S. (2013). Towards dialogic teaching in science: Challenging classroom realities through teacher education. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.

[14] Lehesvuori, S., Viiri, J., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2011). Introducing dialogic teaching to science student teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(8), 705–727. | DOI 10.1007/s10972-011-9253-0

[15] Lehesvuori, S., Viiri, J., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Moate, J., & Helaakoski, J. (2013). Visualizing communication structures in science classrooms: Tracing cumulativity in teacher-led whole class discussions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(8), 912–939. | DOI 10.1002/tea.21100

[16] Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Company.

[17] Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

[18] Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[19] Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge, talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.

[20] Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.

[21] Mercer, N. (2009). Developing argumentation: Lessons learned in the primary school. In N. Muller Mirza & A. N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and education (s. 177–194). New York: Springer.

[22] Mercer, N., Dawes, L., & Staarman, K. (2009). Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom. Language and Education, 23(4), 353–369. | DOI 10.1080/09500780902954273

[23] Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 367–385. | DOI 10.1080/01411920410001689689

[24] Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: A sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.

[25] Monet, J. A., & Etkina, E. (2008). Fostering self-reflection and meaningful learning: Earth science professional development for middle school science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 455–475. | DOI 10.1007/s10972-008-9106-7

[26] Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in science classrooms. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

[27] Nassaji, H., & Wells, G. (2000). What's the use of "triadic dialogue"? An investigation of teacher-students interaction. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 376–406. | DOI 10.1093/applin/21.3.376

[28] O'Brien, J. (1993). Action research through stimulated recall. Research in Science Education, 23(1), 214–221. | DOI 10.1007/BF02357063

[29] Oliveira, A. W. (2009). Developing elementary teachers' understandings of hedges and personal pronouns in inquiry-based science classroom discourse. Journal of Research in Science Education, 8(2), 247–269.

[30] Oliveira, A. W. (2010). Improving teacher questioning in science inquiry discussions through professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 422–453. | DOI 10.1002/tea.20345

[31] Orland-Barak, L., & Yinon, H. (2007). When theory meets practice: What student teachers learn from guided reflection on their own classroom discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 957–969. | DOI 10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.005

[32] Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

[33] Peters, E. E. (2010). Shifting to a student-centered science classroom: An exploration of teacher and student changes in perceptions and practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(3), 329–349. | DOI 10.1007/s10972-009-9178-z

[34] Scott, P., & Ametller, J. (2007). Teaching science in a meaningful way: Striking a balance between 'opening up' and 'closing down' classroom talk. School Science Review, 88(324),

[35] 77–83.

[36] Scott, P., Ametller, J., Mortimer, E., & Emberton, J. (2010). Teaching and learning disciplinary knowledge. In K. Littleton & C. Howe (Eds.), Educational dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction (s. 322–337). London: Routledge.

[37] Science competencies for tomorrow' world, volume 1 – Analysis (2007). Paris: OECD.

[38] Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, D. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(3), 605–631. | DOI 10.1002/sce.20131

[39] Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Harper Collins.

[40] Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[41] Šeďová, K., Šalamounová, Z., & Švaříček, R. (2014). Troubles with dialogic teaching. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3(4), 274–285. | DOI 10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.04.001

[42] Webb, N. (2009). The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 1–28. | DOI 10.1348/000709908X380772

[43] Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[44] Wells, G., & Arauz, R. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379–428. | DOI 10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3

[45] Westerman, D. A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 292–305. | DOI 10.1177/002248719104200407