Exploring Teacher Contributions to Student Argumentation Quality

[1] Adler, M., Rougle, E., Kaiser, E., & Caughlan, S. (2003). Closing the gap between concept and practice: Toward more dialogic discussion in the language arts classroom. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 47(4), 312–322.

[2] Alvermann, D. E., & Hayes, D. A. (1989). Classroom discussion of content area reading assignments: An intervention study. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(3), 305–335. | DOI 10.2307/747772

[3] Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–291). New York: Longman.

[4] Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685–730. | DOI 10.3102/00028312040003685

[5] Arnett, K., & Turnbull, M. (2008). Teacher beliefs in second and foreign language teaching: A state of the art review. In H.J. Sisken (Ed.), From thought to action: Exploring beliefs and outcomes in the foreign language program (pp. 9–29). Boston: Thomson Heinle.

[6] Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 626–639. | DOI 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.626

[7] Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2004). Teachers' stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices. Applied Linguistics 25(2), 243–272. | DOI 10.1093/applin/25.2.243

[8] Borg, S. (1998). Teachers' pedagogical systems and grammar teaching: A qualitative study. TESOL Quarterly, 32(1), 9–38. | DOI 10.2307/3587900

[9] Borg, S. (2011). The impact of in-service teacher education on language teachers' beliefs. System, 39(3), 370-380. | DOI 10.1016/j.system.2011.07.009

[10] Breen, M., Hird, B., Milton, M., Oliver, R., & Thwaite, A. (2001) Making sense of language teaching: Teachers' principles and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics 22(4), 470–501. | DOI 10.1093/applin/22.4.470

[11] Burbules, N. (1993). Dialogue in teaching: Theory and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

[12] Commeyras, M., & DeGroff, L. (1998). Literacy professionals' perspectives on professional development and pedagogy: A United States Survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 33(4), 434–472. | DOI 10.1598/RRQ.33.4.5

[13] Dewey, J. (1997). How we think. New York: Dover Publications.

[14] Dong, T., Anderson, R. C., Li, Y., & Kim, I. (2008). Collaborative reasoning in China and Korea. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(4), 400–424. | DOI 10.1598/RRQ.43.4.5

[15] Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. | DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A

[16] Duschl, R., Ellenbogen, K., & Erduran, S. (1999, March 28-31). Promoting argumentation in middle school science classrooms: A project SEPIA evaluation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Boston, United States. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED453050.pdf

[17] Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. | DOI 10.1002/sce.20012

[18] Ford, M., & Forman, E. (2006). Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education, 30(1), 1–32. | DOI 10.3102/0091732X030001001

[19] Frijters, S., ten Dam, G., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2008). Effects of dialogic learning on valueloaded critical thinking. Learning and Instruction, 18(1), 66–82. | DOI 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.001

[20] García-Moriyón, F., Rebollo, I., & Colom, R. (2004). Evaluating philosophy for children: A meta-analysis. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 17(4), 14–22.

[21] Gillies, R., Nichols, K., Burgh, G., & Haynes, M. (2012). The effects of two strategic and meta-cognitive questioning approaches on children's explanatory behavior, problem-solving and learning during cooperative, inquiry-based science. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 93–106. | DOI 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.02.003

[22] Glaser, G., & Strauss, A. (2008). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.

[23] Green, L., Condy, J., & Chigona, A. (2012). Developing the language of thinking within a classroom community of inquiry: Pre-service teacher's experiences. South African Journal of Education, 32(3), 319–330. | DOI 10.15700/saje.v32n3a583

[24] Gregory, M. (2007). A framework for facilitating classroom dialogue. Teaching Philosophy, 30(1), 59–84. | DOI 10.5840/teachphil200730141

[25] Gregory, M. (2009). Ethics education and the practice of wisdom. Teaching Ethics, 9(2), 105–130. | DOI 10.5840/tej2009929

[26] Gregory, M., & Laverty, M. J. (2009). Philosophy and education for wisdom. In A. Kenkmann (Ed.), Teaching philosophy (pp. 155–173). London: Continuum International.

[27] Halpern, D. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449–455. | DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.53.4.449

[28] Harutounian-Gordon, S. (2009). Learning to teach through discussion: The art of turning the soul. New Haven: Yale University Press.

[29] Isikoglu, N., Basturk, R., & Karaca, F. (2009). Assessing in-service teachers' instructional beliefs about student-centered education: A Turkish perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(2), 350–356. | DOI 10.1016/j.tate.2008.08.004

[30] Jadallah, M., Miller, B. W., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Zhang, J., Archodido, A., & Grabow, K. (2009). Collaborative reasoning about a science and public policy issue. In M. McKowen & L. Kucan (Eds.), Bringing reading research to life: Essays in honor of Isabel L. Beck (pp. 170–193). New York Guilford Press.

[31] Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). Doing the lesson or doing science: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757–792. | DOI 10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F

[32] Juzwik, M. M., Sherry, M. B., Caughlan, S., Heintz, A., & Borsheim-Black, C. (2012). Supporting dialogically organized instruction in an English teacher preparation program: Video-based, web 2.0-mediated response and revision pedagogy. Teachers College Record, 114(3), 1–42.

[33] Kagan, D.M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65–90. | DOI 10.1207/s15326985ep2701_6

[34] Kelly, G., Druker, S., & Chen, C. (1998). Students' reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20(7), 849–871. | DOI 10.1080/0950069980200707

[35] Kennedy, D. (2004). The philosopher as teacher: The role of a facilitator in a community of philosophical inquiry. Metaphilosophy, 35(5), 744–765. | DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2004.00348.x

[36] Kennedy, D. (2013). Developing philosophical facilitation: A toolbox of philosophical moves. In S. Goering, N. Shudak, & T. Wartenberg (Eds.), Philosophy in schools: An introduction for philosophers and teachers (pp. 110–118). New York: Routledge.

[37] Kovalainen, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2005). The discursive practice of participation in an elementary classroom community. Instructional Science, 33(3), 213–250. | DOI 10.1007/s11251-005-2810-1

[38] Kovalainen, M., Kumpulainen, K., & Vasama, S. (2001). Orchestrating classroom interaction. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2), 17–28.

[39] Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents' thinking. Psychological Science, 22(4), 545–552. | DOI 10.1177/0956797611402512

[40] Kyle, J. A. (1983). Thinking in writing. Analytic Teaching, 4(1), 5–9.

[41] Kyle, J. A. (1987). Not a success story: Why P4C did not 'take' with gifted students in a summer school setting. Analytic Teaching, 7(2), 11–16.

[42] Lipman, M., & Sharp, A. M. (1978). Growing up with philosophy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

[43] Lipman, M., Sharp, A., & Oscanyan, F. (1980). Philosophy in the classroom. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

[44] Lipman, M. (1981). Philosophy for children. In A. L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: Programs for teaching thinking (pp. 35–38). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curricular Development.

[45] Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

[46] Mayer, S. J. (2012). Classroom discourse and democracy: Making meanings together. New York: Peter Lang.

[47] Mead, G. H. (1962). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[48] Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children's talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95–111. | DOI 10.1080/0141192990250107

[49] Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: A socio-cultural approach. London: Routledge.

[50] Merriam, S., & Tisdell, E. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.).San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

[51] Michaels, S., O'Connor, C., & Resnick, L. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy & Education, 27(4), 283–297. | DOI 10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1

[52] Murphy, P. K., Wilkinson, I. A. G., Soter, A. O., Hennessey, M. N., & Alexander, J. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students' comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 740–764. | DOI 10.1037/a0015576

[53] Nielsen, J. A. (2011). Dialectical features of students' argumentation: A critical review of argumentation studies in science education. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 371–393. | DOI 10.1007/s11165-011-9266-x

[54] Niklasson, J., Ohlsson, R., & Ringborg, M. (1996). Evaluating philosophy for children. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 12(4), 17–23.

[55] Nussbaum, E. M., & Sinatra, G. M. (2003). Argument and conceptual engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 384–395. | DOI 10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00038-3

[56] Nussbaum, M. (2011). Argumentation, dialogue theory, and probability modeling: Alternative frameworks for argumentation research in education. Educational Psychologist, 46(2), 84–106. | DOI 10.1080/00461520.2011.558816

[57] Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teacher College Press.

[58] Nystrand, M., Wu, L., Gamoran, A., Zeiser, S., & Long, D.A. (2003). Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes, 35(2), 135–198.

[59] Oyler, J. (2015). Expert teacher contributions to argumentation quality during inquiry dialogue (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/etd/78/

[60] Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. | DOI 10.3102/00346543062003307

[61] Patton, M. (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

[62] Peirce, C. S. (1955). The fixation of belief. In J. Buchler (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce (pp. 7–31). New York: Dover Publications.

[63] Reed, S. K. (1993). A schema-based theory of transfer. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 39–67). Norwood: Ablex.

[64] Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., McNurlen, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A., & Kim, S. (2001). Influence of oral discussion on written argument. Discourse Processes, 32(2–3), 155–175.

[65] Reznitskaya, A., & Anderson, R. C. (2002). The argument schema and learning to reason. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction (pp. 319–334). New York: Guilford.

[66] Reznitskaya, A. (2004). Empirical research in philosophy for children: Limitations and new directions. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 17(4), 4–13.

[67] Reznitskaya, A., Glina, M., Carolan, B., Michaud, O., Rogers, J., & Sequeira, L. (2012). Examining transfer effects from dialogic discussions to new tasks and contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(4), 289–306. | DOI 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.02.003

[68] Reznitskaya, A., Glina, M., & Oyler, J. (2011). Dialogic inquiry tool. Montclair: The Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children.

[69] Reznitskaya, A., & Gregory, M. (2013). Student thought and classroom language: Examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching. Educational Psychologist, 48(2), 114–133. | DOI 10.1080/00461520.2013.775898

[70] Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.

[71] Schreier, M. (2013) Qualitative Content Analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 170–183). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

[72] Scott, P. S., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605–631. | DOI 10.1002/sce.20131

[73] Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[74] Sharp, A. M. (1987). Pedagogical practice and philosophy: The case for ethical inquiry. Analytic Teaching, 7(2), 4–7.

[75] Soter, A., Wilkinson, I. A. G., Murphy, P. K., Rudge, L., Reninger, K., & Edwards, M. (2008). What the discourse tells us: Talk and indicators of high-level comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(6), 372–391. | DOI 10.1016/j.ijer.2009.01.001

[76] Splitter, L., & Sharp, A. M. (1995). Teaching for better thinking: The classroom community of inquiry. Melbourne: ACER.

[77] Splitter, L. J., & Sharp, A. M. (1996). The practice of philosophy in the classroom. In R. F. Reed & A. M. Sharp (Eds.), Studies in philosophy for children: Pixie (pp. 285–314). Madrid: Ediciones De La Torre.

[78] Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Schools should nurture wisdom. In B. Z. Presseisen (Ed.), Teaching for intelligence (pp. 55–82). Arlington Heights: Skylight Training and Publishing.

[79] Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[80] Thorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B. (1979). The use of schemata in the acquisition and transfer of knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 11(1), 82–106. | DOI 10.1016/0010-0285(79)90005-7

[81] Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[82] Trickey, S., & Topping, K. J. (2004). Philosophy for children: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 19(3), 365–380. | DOI 10.1080/0267152042000248016

[83] Vygotsky, L. S. (1968). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.

[84] Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher-order mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk: Sharpe.

[85] Waggoner, M., Chinn, C. A., Yi, H., & Anderson, R. C. (1995). Collaborative reasoning about stories. Language Arts, 72(8), 582–589.

[86] Walton, D.N. (1989). Dialogue theory for critical thinking. Argumentation 3(2), 169–184. | DOI 10.1007/BF00128147

[87] Walton, D. (1998). The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

[88] Wells, G. (2007). Semiotic mediation, dialogue and the construction of knowledge. Human Development, 50(5), 244–274. | DOI 10.1159/000106414

[89] Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 301–311. | DOI 10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.301